Federal contractor · MOUNTAIN CENTER, CA

SANTA ROSA BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

SANTA ROSA BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS received $23K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $206.7K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($23K). It also received $340.4K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$23K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MHFLEGLFX3E3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.1KFY2017
  2. 23.6KFY2018
  3. 18.7KFY2019
  4. 19.2KFY2020
  5. 19.8KFY2021
  6. 20.4KFY2022
  7. 21KFY2023
  8. 21.6KFY2024
  9. 22.3KFY2025
  10. 23KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$23K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $23K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $23K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Riverside County, CA· Construction & real property· May 1, 2024 – Aug 21, 2026· 140L1224P0011

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SANTA ROSA BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS received $340.4K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 11 actions (3 new awards), −45% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 15.020 · Aid to Tribal Governments ($168.2K).

Assistance · FY2026
$340.4K
New awards
3
Actions
11
Since FY2021
$8.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 4.7MFY2021
  2. 649.8KFY2022
  3. 1.2MFY2023
  4. 1.5MFY2024
  5. 615.3KFY2025
  6. 340.4KFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$214.2K63%
  2. Grants$75K22%
  3. Other assistance$51.2K15%

Top programs

  1. 15.020 · Aid to Tribal Governments$168.2K49%
  2. 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants$65K19%
  3. 20.205 · Highway Planning and Construction$51.2K15%
  4. 15.144 · Indian Child Welfare Act Title Ii Grants$29.5K8.7%
  5. 45.311 · Native American and Native Hawaiian Library Services$10K2.9%
  6. 15.035 · Forestry on Indian Lands$10K2.9%
  7. 15.033 · Road Maintenance Indian Roads$6,4951.9%

Largest awards

  1. 15.020 · Aid to Tribal Governments· Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Direct payment for specified use· Mar 21, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· A25AV00635
  2. 20.205 · Highway Planning and Construction· Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Other financial assistance· Sep 17, 2022 – Sep 17, 2026· A22AV01181
  3. 66.605 · Performance Partnership Grants· Environmental Protection Agency· Grant· Sep 9, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 00T39926
  4. 15.144 · Indian Child Welfare Act Title Ii Grants· Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Direct payment for specified use· May 26, 2022 – Jun 17, 2026· A22AV00533
  5. 15.144 · Indian Child Welfare Act Title Ii Grants· Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Direct payment for specified use· Mar 24, 2025 – Jun 15, 2026· A25AV00652
  6. 15.035 · Forestry on Indian Lands· Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Direct payment for specified use· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· A26AV00457

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GLASGOW, MT · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support
  2. COUNTY OF DONA ANA$75.1K−13% in FY2026
    LAS CRUCES, NM · 2 entities · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support
  3. GUNNISON, CO · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support

Showing the top 3 of 4 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.