Federal contractor · GUNNISON, CO

UPPER GUNNISON RIV WTR CONSERVANCY DISTRICT

No contract obligations recorded for UPPER GUNNISON RIV WTR CONSERVANCY DISTRICT in FY2026. Since FY2017: $326.8K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
ERPKFR7LV889
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.2KFY2017
  2. 7.4KFY2018
  3. 7.6KFY2019
  4. -7.6KFY2021
  5. 312.2KFY2024
  6. 0FY2025
  7. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Land Management$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. GOOD NEIGHBOR AUTHORITY - GUNNISON COUNTY WET MEADOW RESTORATION$312.2K
    Bureau of Land Management· Gunnison County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Sep 19, 2024 – Jul 9, 2026· 140L1724C0003

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UPPER GUNNISON RIV WTR CONSERVANCY DISTRICT received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$1.1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 91.4KFY2021
  2. 145KFY2022
  3. 328.7KFY2023
  4. 153KFY2024
  5. 420KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. UPPER GUNNISON BASIN WET MEADOWS CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT$545K
    15.244 · Aquatics Resources Management· Bureau of Land Management· Cooperative agreement· Sep 19, 2024 – Jul 7, 2026· L24AC00687

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KANE COUNTY$317.2K−9.3% in FY2026
    KANAB, UT · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support
  2. VALLEY COUNTY TREASURER$80K
    GLASGOW, MT · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support
  3. SANTA ROSA BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS$66.9K+3% in FY2026
    MOUNTAIN CENTER, CA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Executive, legislative, and other general government support

Showing the top 3 of 4 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.