Federal contractor · LIBERTY LAKE, WA

SCANIVALVE CORP

SCANIVALVE CORP received $309K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−6.4% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.7M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($309K).

Obligations · FY2026
$309K
New awards
3
Sole-source
32%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MFUZTVNJ2SM9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 629.8KFY2017
  2. 287.5KFY2018
  3. 34.1KFY2019
  4. 179KFY2020
  5. 364KFY2021
  6. 29.1KFY2022
  7. 393.3KFY2023
  8. 171.9KFY2024
  9. 330.3KFY2025
  10. 309KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$309K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$288.5K93%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$20.5K6.6%

Where the work was performed

  1. Spokane County, WA$309K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition32%
    US 39% · $99.6K
  • Sole-source awards32%
    US 30% · $99.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$99.6K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. SCANIVALVE PRESSURE SYSTEM$209.4K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Spokane County, WA· IT & telecom· Jun 17, 2026 – Jun 17, 2026· 80NSSC26P0830
  2. SCANIVALVE CALIBRATION SYSTEM$79.1K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Spokane County, WA· IT & telecom· Jun 22, 2026 – Jun 22, 2026· 80NSSC26P0862
  3. PRESSURE SYSTEMS CONNECTORS$20.5K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Spokane County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 31, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 80NSSC26P1168

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $88.2K reported

  1. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$88.2K
    SPARKS, NV · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ZWICKROELL, LP$579.2K+259% in FY2026
    KENNESAW, GA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. PACIFIC INSTRUMENTS, INC.$1.8M−37% in FY2026
    CONCORD, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+1 more
  3. IMAGINE-X INC$417.7K
    SHIBUYA-KU, JPN · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.