Federal contractor · FREDERICK, MD

SDVO SOLUTIONS, LLC

SDVO SOLUTIONS, LLC received $22.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 41 awards (−4.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $91.4M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($13.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22.4M
New awards
41
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
5.0%
UEI
KL7DMG4LKFM5
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.1KFY2017
  2. 197.7KFY2018
  3. 1.4MFY2019
  4. 2.6MFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 13.3MFY2022
  7. 10.8MFY2023
  8. 15.7MFY2024
  9. 23.4MFY2025
  10. 22.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 3 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$22.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.0%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions5.0%
    US 8.8% · $1.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Travis County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 36C10B26F0375
  2. Food and Drug Administration· Frederick County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 28, 2019 – Dec 24, 2025· 75F40119F80168
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· 75H70424F80021
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C10B26F0465
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 2, 2024 – Jul 21, 2026· 36C10B24F0209
  6. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Frederick County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 12314426F0532
  7. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2025 – Feb 26, 2026· HT001525FE057
  8. OMNISSA$1.2M
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Feb 2, 2026 – May 28, 2026· 7571TE26F80004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $506.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $506.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.7M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 39 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL INC$67M−53% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  2. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. KIHEI, HI · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.