Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD

SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

No contract obligations recorded for SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $140.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
WZZSXMA52K46
Parent company
SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 929.4KFY2017
  2. 577.7KFY2018
  3. 995KFY2019
  4. 5.5MFY2020
  5. 5.8MFY2021
  6. 28.3MFY2022
  7. 23.8MFY2023
  8. 47.1MFY2024
  9. 27.9MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. DEFENSE CYBER WEAPONS SYSTEMS ARE SELF-CONTAINED, FLY AWAY SUITES FOR MARINE CORPS DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS TEAMS TO CONDUCT VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS, INCIDENT RESPONSE, TERRAIN MAPPING, AND OTHER FUNCTIONS.$89.3M
    Department of the Navy· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Aug 11, 2022 – Nov 24, 2025· M6785422F7700
  2. THE DDS-MV2 KITS ARE CUSTOMIZED MOBILE COMPUTE AND STORAGE SYSTEMS USED BY CYBER PROTECTION BRIGADE SOLDIERS TO ANALYZE, DEFEND, AND MITIGATE CYBER THREATS AGAINST ARMY NETWORKS THAT ARE CONSTANTLY UNDER ATTACK.$13.4M
    Department of the Army· Howard County, MD· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2024 – May 19, 2026· W519TC24C0026

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.3M (4 subawards)

3 primes

  1. SALIENT CRGT, INC.$3.1M58%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards
  2. GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.$1.4M26%
    DEDHAM, MA · 1 subaward
  3. PERATON INC.$839.6K16%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $10.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $212.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $76.4K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $5.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $21.1M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$14M
    GROTON, CT · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SALIENT CRGT, INC.$3.1M
    FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$2.3M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. C4 PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC$69.8M−7.7% in FY2026
    BLYTHE, GA · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. JMA RESOURCES, INC.$44.5M−48% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MALASHA TECHNOLOGIES INC$37.1M+6.6% in FY2026
    WEST CHESTER, OH · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.