Federal contractor · GOLETA, CA

SENSEEKER CORP

SENSEEKER CORP received $2.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.6M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
75%
UEI
EKC3M5MM9LU5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.8MFY2017
  2. 736.4KFY2018
  3. 1.2MFY2019
  4. 0FY2020
  5. 251.2KFY2021
  6. 1.3MFY2022
  7. 3.4MFY2023
  8. 4.5MFY2024
  9. 3.3MFY2025
  10. 2.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$2M75%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$650K25%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$2.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jefferson County, CO$2M75%
  2. Santa Barbara County, CA$650K25%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition75%
    US 39% · $2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions75%
    US 8.8% · $2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MUST HITS DROIC$6.3M
    Department of the Navy· Santa Barbara County, CA· Research & development· Dec 20, 2022 – Feb 18, 2026· N0001423C1008
  2. A244-061 - EVOLUTION OF 3GEN+ ADVANCED PROCESS IP$2M
    Department of the Army· Jefferson County, CO· Research & development· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W5170126CA134

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $315.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$315.8K100%
    LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $221.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $823.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $613.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $315.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $3M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$730.1K
    MELBOURNE, FL · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$449K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. KBR SERVICES, LLC$424.5K
    HOUSTON, TX · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NANOVOX, LLC$10.7M−27% in FY2026
    CORVALLIS, OR · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.$11.3M−88% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. ARCHITECTURE TECHNOLOGY INC$14.2M−88% in FY2026
    EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.