Federal contractor · COLLEGE STATION, TX

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS INC

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS INC received -$3,895 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $46M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$3,895
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YJXQFQ83DQR4
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.5MFY2017
  2. 3.3MFY2018
  3. 8.2MFY2019
  4. 6.7MFY2020
  5. 4.1MFY2021
  6. 2.6MFY2022
  7. 3.9MFY2023
  8. 6.3MFY2024
  9. 2.5MFY2025
  10. -3.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards
  2. Internal Revenue Service-$3,8950.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. TECHNOLOGY FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATED DIGITAL ENGINEERING USING SEMANTICS (TIDES) PHASE II SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Morris County, NJ· Research & development· Jun 11, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· W15QKN24C0026
  2. ABC SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE$15.7K
    Internal Revenue Service· Shelby County, TN· IT & telecom· Feb 24, 2022 – Jan 7, 2026· 2043FY22P00075

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $641.4K paid out · $650K received
  • FY2022: $50K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $397.9K paid out · $300K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $82.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $1.1M reported

  1. TEXAS A&M ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION$416.4K
    COLLEGE STATION, TX · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. PATCHPLUS CONSULTING INC$285.6K
    MEDFORD, NJ · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$225K
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1M reported

  1. TEXAS A&M ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION$650K
    COLLEGE STATION, TX · 1 subaward
  2. PATCHPLUS CONSULTING INC$300K
    MEDFORD, NJ · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS, INC.$82.4K
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AQWEST, LLC$6.4M−76% in FY2026
    LARKSPUR, CO · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. SENSEEKER CORP$10.5M−20% in FY2026
    GOLETA, CA · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. SYNAPSEMX, INC$6M
    NEWNAN, GA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.