Federal contractor · MORAGA, CA

SFS CHEMICAL SAFETY INC

SFS CHEMICAL SAFETY INC received $270.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4M. Its largest customer was Environmental Protection Agency ($110.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$270.4K
New awards
4
Sole-source
42%
Single offer
58%
UEI
LCV4NZXSEJV1
Other than small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 108.3KFY2017
  2. 595.3KFY2018
  3. 208.3KFY2019
  4. 381.7KFY2020
  5. 278.1KFY2021
  6. 588.6KFY2022
  7. 583KFY2023
  8. 638.3KFY2024
  9. 334.6KFY2025
  10. 270.4KFY2026
  11. 17.3KFY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$270.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $270.4K
  • Sole-source awards42%
    US 30% · $114K
  • Single-offer competitions58%
    US 8.7% · $156.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Monongalia County, WV· IT & telecom· Aug 24, 2022 – Jul 1, 2026· 89243322PFE000569
  2. Federal Bureau of Investigation· Contra Costa County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2023 – Sep 21, 2026· 15F06723F0001897
  3. Environmental Protection Agency· Contra Costa County, CA· IT & telecom· Jul 30, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026· 68HERF26F0152
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Clark County, NV· IT & telecom· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· 80NSSC26P0050

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $46K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $602K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $61.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $231K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $940.6K reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 4 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. GREENVILLE, SC · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHIVAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC$1.9M−30% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related servicesEnvironmental Protection Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MICHEL, STEVE$403.2K0% in FY2026
    ALBANY, CA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.