Federal contractor · NEWINGTON, NH

SIG SAUER INC.

SIG SAUER INC. received $313.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 290 awards (−23% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($304.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$313.8M
New awards
290
Sole-source
2.1%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
R5KXGA7V9AL8
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $313.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. SIG SAUER INC.NEWINGTON, NH · Family page
    $313.8M
  2. SIG SAUER, INCNEWINGTON, NH
    $0
  3. SIG SAUER, INC.JACKSONVILLE, AR
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. 59.3MFY2019
  4. 39.8MFY2020
  5. 17.4MFY2021
  6. 92.9MFY2022
  7. 134.8MFY2023
  8. 211.1MFY2024
  9. 407.4MFY2025
  10. 313.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 36 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 190 awards
  5. 33 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 4 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$310.2M99%
  2. Professional services$3.5M1.1%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$41.9K0.0%
  4. Construction & real property$33K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.2%
    US 39% · $6.8M
  • Sole-source awards2.1%
    US 30% · $6.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $109.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 3 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs · 25 awards
  3. Department of Justice · 3 awards
  4. Department of the Interior · 2 awards
  5. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 15, 2026 – Apr 15, 2026· W15QKN26F0164
  2. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 19, 2025 – Mar 18, 2026· W15QKN26F0052
  3. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 18, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· W15QKN25C0021
  4. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 31, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· W15QKN24F0296
  5. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· W15QKN26F0146
  6. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 17, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· W15QKN25F0194
  7. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 5, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· W15QKN24F0422
  8. Department of the Army· Rockingham County, NH· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· W15QKN26F0158

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $664.4K (5 subawards)

5 sub-recipients

  1. MILAN, TN · 1 subaward
  2. BERLIN, CT · 1 subaward
  3. GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL LLC$65.9K9.9%
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  4. SANFORD, FL · 1 subaward
  5. B & R MACHINE INC$37K5.6%
    LUDLOW, MA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $43.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.2% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $33.8K received
  • FY2024: $630.7K paid out · $658.6K received
  • FY2025: $13.6M paid out · $160K received
  • FY2026: $664.4K paid out · $43.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

14 companies · $14.9M reported

  1. GRANDEUR FASTENERS INC$7.2M
    DANVILLE, AR · 1 subaward · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. BERLIN, CT · 2 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $896.2K reported

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 3 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AMTEC CORPORATION$1.2B−29% in FY2026
    JANESVILLE, WI · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. MSM GROUP NORTH AMERICA INC.$635.2M−100% in FY2026
    SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. GLOBAL MILITARY PRODUCTS INC$1.1B−103% in FY2026
    TAMPA, FL · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SIG SAUER INC. (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SIG SAUER, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.3M
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.7M
$2.7M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$25.2K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$240K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$530K
    7 reports
  3. 2025$1.3M
    12 reports
  4. 2026$630K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense26 reports
  2. Trade (domestic and foreign)14 reports
  3. Firearms, guns and ammunition12 reports
  4. Foreign relations7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES26 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE24 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$480K
    9 reports
  2. Miller Strategies, LLC$470K
    3 reports
  3. Capitol 6 Advisors$70K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$27.9K111%
  2. Democratic-$2,750-10.9%

PACs sponsored

  • SIG SAUER, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA 'SIG SAUER PAC')$76K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.