Federal contractor · PLEASANTON, CA

SPATIAL INFORMATICS GROUP LLC

SPATIAL INFORMATICS GROUP LLC received $350K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2017: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($350K). It also received $335K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$350K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VTC4RJ86D2X6
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 321.7KFY2017
  2. 458.6KFY2018
  3. -16KFY2019
  4. 68.4KFY2020
  5. 113.6KFY2021
  6. 363.6KFY2022
  7. 115.7KFY2023
  8. 312.6KFY2024
  9. -63.5KFY2025
  10. 350KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$350K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$350K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Alameda County, CA$350K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ESTCP NH26-9510 - ENHANCING DOD RESILIENCE BY FORECASTING 1- TO 10-YEAR FIRE WEATHER EXTREMES, WILDFIRE HAZARDS, AND PRESCRIBED BURN OPPORTUNITIES.$350K
    Department of the Army· Alameda County, CA· Research & development· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W912HQ26CA031

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

SPATIAL INFORMATICS GROUP LLC received $335K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 4 actions (1 new awards), −82% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 10.699 · Partnership Agreements ($335K).

Assistance · FY2026
$335K
New awards
1
Actions
4
Since FY2022
$7.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 731.1KFY2022
  2. 419.2KFY2023
  3. 4.3MFY2024
  4. 1.8MFY2025
  5. 335KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$335K100%

Top programs

  1. 10.699 · Partnership Agreements$335K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Forest Service$335K100%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. PLANSCAPE PROMOTE DEVELOPMENT FOR WILDFIRE CRISIS STRATEGY$970K
    10.724 · Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Jul 1, 2024 – Feb 23, 2026· 24CS11272122024
  2. ** AWARDS ISSUED PRIOR TO JANUARY 20, 2025, WERE FUNDED UNDER PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS AND MAY NOT REFLECT THE PRIORITIES AND POLICIES OF…$650K
    10.212 · Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program / Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program· National Institute of Food and Agriculture· Project grant· Sep 1, 2024 – Aug 26, 2026· 20247001243705
  3. THIS PROJECT SUPPORTS RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTS OF THINNING AND PRESCRIBED BURNING TREATMENTS ON IMPROVING FOREST HEALTH AND INCREASING…$335K
    10.699 · Partnership Agreements· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Jun 16, 2026 – Jun 16, 2026· 26CS11221637012

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $770.5K (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$670.5K87%
    MISSOULA, MT · 1 subaward
  2. WISEWOOD INC$50K6.5%
    PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward
  3. OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$50K6.5%
    CORVALLIS, OR · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $261.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $503.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $200.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $770.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $3.5M reported

  1. AMERICAN FORESTS$1.4M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  2. UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$670.5K
    MISSOULA, MT · 1 subaward
  3. OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$540.6K
    CORVALLIS, OR · 9 subawards · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HORSTMAN, INC.$362.4K
    STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 2 entities · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. TRANSPHORM, INC$503.8K
    GOLETA, CA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. INERTIAL LABS, INC.$595.7K
    PAEONIAN SPRINGS, VA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Spatial Informatics Group (SIG)AI match · 100%
  • Spatial Informatics Group, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$200K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2026$120K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations8 reports
  2. Disaster planning and emergencies2 reports
  3. Natural resources2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE8 reports
  3. Agriculture - Dept of (USDA)6 reports
  4. Interior - Dept of (DOI)4 reports
  5. U.S. Forest Service2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$80K
    4 reports
  2. Capitol Counsel LLC$60K
    2 reports
  3. Collective Strategies & Communications$60K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.