Federal contractor · CORVALLIS, OR

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY received $4.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (−25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $68.9M. Its largest customer was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($1.4M). It also received $212.8M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$4.8M
New awards
48
Sole-source
66%
Single offer
3.8%
UEI
MZ4DYXE1SL98
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.6MFY2017
  2. 6.5MFY2018
  3. 8.6MFY2019
  4. 5.8MFY2020
  5. 9.9MFY2021
  6. 8.2MFY2022
  7. 9.2MFY2023
  8. 5MFY2024
  9. 6.4MFY2025
  10. 4.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 7 awards
  6. 5 awards
  7. 6 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 2 awards
  10. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.2M25%
  2. Education & social services$1M21%
  3. Research & development$869.2K18%
  4. Professional services$856K18%
  5. Facilities & utilities$646.8K14%
  6. IT & telecom$166.5K3.5%
  7. Equipment maintenance$17.6K0.4%
  8. Health & medical$4,8810.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition70%
    US 39% · $3.3M
  • Sole-source awards66%
    US 30% · $3.2M
  • Single-offer competitions3.8%
    US 8.7% · $179.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 6 awards
  2. Department of Agriculture · 7 awards
  3. Department of the Interior · 2 awards
  4. Department of the Interior · 3 awards
  5. Environmental Protection Agency · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 31, 2017 – Feb 23, 2026· DOCAB133F17CN0142
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Benton County, OR· Construction & real property· Feb 28, 2023 – Sep 10, 2026· 1305M323CNFFP0009
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Benton County, OR· Research & development· Jun 24, 2022 – Nov 13, 2025· 80GSFC22CA050
  4. Department of the Army· Benton County, OR· Research & development· Oct 13, 2023 – May 28, 2026· W912HQ24C0002
  5. Department of the Army· Benton County, OR· Research & development· Mar 10, 2023 – Oct 17, 2025· W912HQ23C0013
  6. Department of the Army· Benton County, OR· Research & development· Sep 7, 2023 – Oct 27, 2025· W912HQ23C0058
  7. Bureau of Land Management· Multnomah County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 4, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026· 140L4326P0121
  8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Lincoln County, OR· IT & telecom· Jul 29, 2024 – Jul 30, 2026· 1305M224P0139

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY received $212.8M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1,041 actions (181 new awards), −9.6% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($49M).

Assistance · FY2026
$212.8M
New awards
181
Actions
1,041
Since FY2021
$1.6B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 286.4MFY2021
  2. 247.6MFY2022
  3. 308.5MFY2023
  4. 292.9MFY2024
  5. 235.3MFY2025
  6. 212.8MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$149.7M70%
  2. Direct payments$52.1M24%
  3. Other assistance$11.1M5.2%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$49M23%
  2. 81.087 · Renewable Energy Research and Development$7.9M3.7%
  3. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships$7.7M3.6%
  4. 93.113 · Environmental Health$7.6M3.6%
  5. 47.050 · Geosciences$7.2M3.4%
  6. 10.309 · Specialty Crop Research Initiative$6.9M3.3%
  7. 47.078 · Polar Programs$6.3M3.0%
  8. 43.001 · Science$6.2M2.9%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Agriculture
  3. Department of Commerce
  4. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 47.050 · Geosciences· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Dec 18, 2020 – Apr 22, 2026· 1748726
  2. 81.087 · Renewable Energy Research and Development· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Dec 23, 2020 – Sep 8, 2026· DEEE0007899
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· May 15, 2024 – Oct 24, 2025· P063P240359
  4. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Jun 19, 2025 – Aug 25, 2026· P063P250359
  5. 93.143 · Niehs Superfund Hazardous Substances_basic Research and Education· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Nov 6, 2020 – Feb 6, 2026· P42ES016465
  6. 47.078 · Polar Programs· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Sep 9, 2021 – Aug 5, 2026· 2019719

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $297.7K (6 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $27.4M (247 subawards)

133 sub-recipients

  1. SEATTLE, WA · 15 subawards
  2. PORTLAND, OR · 8 subawards
  3. NASHVILLE, TN · 3 subawards
  4. EUGENE, OR · 12 subawards
  5. FAIRBANKS, AK · 2 subawards
  6. RICHLAND, WA · 6 subawards
  7. ITHACA, NY · 7 subawards
  8. DAYTON, OH · 1 subaward
  9. SEMIO COMMUNITY$738.8K2.7%
    FLAGSTAFF, AZ · 4 subawards
  10. PULLMAN, WA · 8 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.5M (9 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $22.4M (110 subawards)

72 primes

  1. SEATTLE, WA · 15 subawards
  2. SALEM, OR · 1 subaward
  3. OREGON BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT$2.5M10%
    SALEM, OR · 1 subaward
  4. UNIVERSITY PARK, PA · 3 subawards
  5. WASHINGTON, DC · 2 subawards
  6. BOZEMAN, MT · 9 subawards
  7. PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward
  8. MISSOULA, MT · 1 subaward
  9. COLUMBUS, OH · 2 subawards
  10. ARLINGTON, TX · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 6.3% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $21.5M paid out · $132.4M received
  • FY2022: $29.4M paid out · $125.3M received
  • FY2023: $29.9M paid out · $243M received
  • FY2024: $37.5M paid out · $74.4M received
  • FY2025: $37.2M paid out · $40.7M received
  • FY2026: $27.7M paid out · $23.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

288 companies · $183.6M reported

  1. SEATTLE, WA · 87 subawards
  2. PORTLAND, OR · 58 subawards
  3. DAVIS, CA · 42 subawards

Primes that pay it

188 companies · $639.6M reported

  1. WOODS HOLE, MA · 32 subawards
  2. STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES$27.1M
    SALEM, OR · 6 subawards
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 111 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 24 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$12.7M−55% in FY2026
    EAST LANSING, MI · 3 entities · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsArmy · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  2. COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$16.9M−35% in FY2026
    FORT COLLINS, CO · 3 entities · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services+2 more
  3. ELECTRA.AERO INC.$7.8M−100% in FY2026
    MANASSAS, VA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • OREGON STATE UNIVERSITYAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$220K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$770K
$770K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$220K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$220K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$220K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$110K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense28 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear28 reports
  3. Agriculture14 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  5. Education14 reports
  6. Immigration14 reports
  7. Science and technology14 reports
  8. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Strategic Marketing Innovations$470K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.