Federal contractor · KINSTON, NC

SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
UHW1TV9MWFK4
Parent company
SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC company family: 2 registered entities, $2.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INCBROADLANDS, VA · Family page
    $2.1M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $821.1K reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$653K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$116.6K
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$51.5K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYBERSENSE LLC$4.1M−81% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MARITIME SURVEILLANCE ASSOCIATES INC$4.6M+6.3% in FY2026
    BRUNSWICK, ME · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TACTICAL EDGE, INC.$3.6M−100% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.