Federal contractor · CAMDEN, AR

SPECTRA TECHNOLOGIES LLC

SPECTRA TECHNOLOGIES LLC received -$33.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $38.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
-$33.5K
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YV94LKCWTSX5
Parent company
SPECTRA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 146.1KFY2017
  2. 197.4KFY2018
  3. 8.6MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 2.8MFY2021
  6. 940.5KFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 10.6MFY2024
  9. 11.7MFY2025
  10. -33.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Ouachita County, AR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 2, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· W519TC25F0244
  2. Department of the Navy· Ouachita County, AR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 25, 2020 – Oct 28, 2025· N0016420PJ132
  3. Department of the Navy· Calhoun County, AR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 23, 2025 – Nov 6, 2025· N0016425PJ604
  4. Department of the Army· Ouachita County, AR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W519TC26F0044

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $79.2M (10 subawards)

5 primes

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 2 subawards
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 5 subawards
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$997.8K1.3%
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 1 subaward
  4. RAYTHEON COMPANY$304.5K0.4%
    DULLES, VA · 1 subaward
  5. MESA, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $58.5M received
  • FY2023: $75.6K paid out · $8.3M received
  • FY2024: $32.5K paid out · $12.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $11.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $79.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $108.1K reported

  1. METAL IMPACT EAST LLC$75.6K
    GRAHAM, NC · 1 subaward · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. MILLVILLE, NJ · 1 subaward · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $175.2M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 35 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 9 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 10 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JUNGHANS MICROTEC GMBH$21.3M−100% in FY2026
    DUNNINGEN, DEU · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. RDZM, LLC$19.4M−100% in FY2026
    MIDDLETOWN, IA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. GREENVILLE, WI · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.