Federal contractor · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
STANTEC GS INC.
STANTEC GS INC. received $3.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $122.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $3.1M
- New awards
- 18
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 60%
- UEI
- P4FGL9JCNRM9
- Parent company
- STANTEC CONSULTING MICHIGAN INC.
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. company family: 56 registered entities, $51.8M in FY2026 together. See the family
- STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.DENVER, CO · Family page$19M
- STANTEC-AECOM SIOP JVBURLINGTON, MA$9.1M
- STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.BURLINGTON, MA$7.6M
- STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.WASHINGTON, DC$3.8M
- STANTEC-VOLKERT-JMT A JVLAUREL, MD$3.7M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 8.8MFY2017
- 14.3MFY2018
- 20.6MFY2019
- 18.7MFY2020
- 9.6MFY2021
- 12.4MFY2022
- 14.4MFY2023
- 9.1MFY2024
- 11.8MFY2025
- 3.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$1.1M37%3 awards
- Departmental Offices$749.8K24%1 awards
- U.S. Coast Guard$725.9K24%1 awards
- Department of the Navy$467.9K15%12 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.3M76%
- Professional services$725.9K24%
Where the work was performed
- Montgomery County, AL$1.1M35%
- Albemarle County, VA$749.8K24%
- Norfolk city, VA$725.9K24%
- San Diego County, CA$268K8.7%
- Island County, WA$199.9K6.5%
- Chittenden County, VT$55.5K1.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition60%US 39% · $1.8M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions60%US 8.8% · $1.8M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Acquisition Service· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 19, 2023 – Jan 28, 2026· 47QFWA23F0037
- U.S. Coast Guard· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Sep 29, 2023 – Aug 25, 2026· 70Z08423FDL950227
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 14, 2022 – Feb 9, 2026· N6247322F4831
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· N6247325F0642
- Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W9127826FA048
- Department of the Army· Chittenden County, VT· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2025 – Apr 9, 2026· W9127825FA274
- Departmental Offices· Albemarle County, VA· Construction & real property· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· 140D0426F0347
- Department of the Navy· Albemarle County, VA· Construction & real property· Jun 15, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· N6247023F4080
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $105.7K (1 subaward)
1 sub-recipient
- PROSPECT HILL CONSULTING LLC$105.7K100%BUFFALO, NY · 1 subaward
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $1M paid out · $163.4K received
- FY2022: $1M paid out · $3M received
- FY2023: $31K paid out · $3.1M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
- FY2025: $555.2K paid out · $3.2M received
- FY2026: $105.7K paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
203 companies · $75.8M reported
- AME CONSULTING ENGINEERS PC$7.2MCHARLOTTE, NC · 37 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BURLINGTON, MA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- N-Y ASSOCIATES INC$3.1MMETAIRIE, LA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
25 companies · $58.6M reported
- COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$18.6MDENVER, CO · 39 subawards
- CH2M HILL, INC$11.3MENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 27 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.$160.8M−75% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 9 entities · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more
- OST INC$141.9M−61% in FY2026WASHINGTON, DC · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesEnergy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.