Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ

STATISTICAL RESEARCH INC

STATISTICAL RESEARCH INC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−47% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $46.4M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($921.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
29%
UEI
H2M4VVBULAT6
Parent company
STATISTICAL RESEARCH, INC.
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.4MFY2017
  2. 6.1MFY2018
  3. 5.7MFY2019
  4. 3.5MFY2020
  5. 1.5MFY2021
  6. 3.7MFY2022
  7. 10.9MFY2023
  8. 4.5MFY2024
  9. 3.3MFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$921.3K52%
    10 awards
  2. Bureau of Land Management$404.4K23%
    3 awards
  3. Bureau of Reclamation$376.8K21%
    1 awards
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service$57.1K3.2%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards
  6. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.2M68%
  2. Facilities & utilities$569.1K32%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Juan County, NM$529.1K30%
  2. Fresno County, CA$445.2K25%
  3. Lander County, NV$344.1K20%
  4. Blaine County, ID$145.2K8.3%
  5. Union County, NM$106K6.0%
  6. Santa Cruz County, AZ$72.6K4.1%
  7. Crook County, OR$60.3K3.4%
  8. Spokane County, WA$57.1K3.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition29%
    US 39% · $510.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions29%
    US 8.8% · $510.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR: PRE-FIELD LITERATURE REVIEWS, STRATIFIED SAMPLE SURVEYS, INTENSIVE FIELD INVENTORIES, SITE MONITORING FOR DETERMINING SITE CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL PROJECT MONITORING TO AVOID POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS, SITE EVA$1.4M
    Forest Service· Baker County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 27, 2023 – Jun 16, 2026· 12363N23F4317
  2. CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF THE 2023 VERSION OF THE HIGHWAY TANKS FUELS TREATMENT PROJECT, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE.$640.3K
    Forest Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 15, 2023 – Apr 22, 2026· 12363N23F4157
  3. MIDNIGHT RESTORATION PROJECT, ENTIAT FB & ROARING FB HERITAGE SURVEY CONTRACT$513.3K
    Forest Service· Chelan County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2024 – Dec 12, 2025· 12363N24F4316
  4. FY23 TRIBAL CONSULTATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUPPORT FOR THE AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER (AFCEC)$475.2K
    Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 19, 2023 – Dec 15, 2025· W912PP23F0029
  5. CULTURAL SURVEYS, REPORTS, AND FIELD IDENTIFICATION (FLAGGING) FOR THE CREEK FIRE RESTORATION PROJECTS WITHIN LANDS ADMINISTERED BY SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST.$445.2K
    Forest Service· Fresno County, CA· Professional services· Sep 3, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 127EAS26F0010
  6. WILDFIRE CRISIS 10-YEAR STRATEGY REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH A HOST OF FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATION. PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED UNDER THE CURRENT STRATEGY WILL REQUIRE ONGOING SUPPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT.$419.6K
    Forest Service· Los Angeles County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 21, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· 12363N23F4296
  7. NGWSP SHIPROCK AND REACH 2-3 MONITORING$376.8K
    Bureau of Reclamation· San Juan County, NM· Professional services· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 140R4026F0070
  8. FUELBREAK CULTURAL- SHOSHONE-DIAMOND 26$344.1K
    Bureau of Land Management· Lander County, NV· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2026 – Sep 25, 2026· 140L3726F0334

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $94.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $62.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $157.3K reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$94.6K
    COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  2. NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY$62.7K
    LAS CRUCES, NM · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYNOPTIC ENGINEERING, LLC$4.9M+98% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. MINNESOTA WIRE & CABLE CO$5M
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. WOLF TECHNICAL SERVICES INC$4.6M+114% in FY2026
    FISHERS, IN · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.