Federal contractor · SHREVEPORT, LA

STEPHENSON STELLAR CORPORATION

STEPHENSON STELLAR CORPORATION received $11.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $80.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($11.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$11.6M
New awards
3
Sole-source
10%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NV8KK5L2AF44
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14MFY2021
  2. 2MFY2022
  3. 14.4MFY2023
  4. 11.2MFY2024
  5. 27MFY2025
  6. 11.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$11.6M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards10%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Caddo Parish, LA· Research & development· Jun 12, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA240123C0010
  2. Department of the Air Force· Bossier Parish, LA· Research & development· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· FA680026F0004
  3. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE523

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $5.1M paid out · $9.5M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $258.9K received
  • FY2024: $1.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.4M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $8.2M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. EAST HARTFORD, CT · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. CINCINNATI, OH · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $9.8M reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ROME, NY · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MATRIX RESEARCH INC$49.2M+3.6% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 2 entities · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. SHREVEPORT, LA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. XANDAR LLC$49.1M+58% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Stephenson Stellar CorporationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$200K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$900K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$320K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$320K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$200K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Defense12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES26 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE26 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. STIERS LLC$480K
    12 reports
  2. Adams and Reese, LLP$420K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026.