Federal contractor · CHANTILLY, VA

STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING LLC

STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING LLC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $14.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($2M).

Obligations · FY2026: $2.2M
New awards: 7
Sole-source: 57%
Single offer: 43%

UEI: E79WJ8NWL474

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

1KFY2021
1.9MFY2022
1.8MFY2023
2.8MFY2024
5.6MFY2025
2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Air Force$2M91%
4 awards
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$189.8K8.6%
2 awards
Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Construction & real property$1.1M48%
Research & development$940.4K43%
IT & telecom$189.8K8.6%
Professional services$13.2K0.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100.0%
US 39% · $2.2M
Sole-source awards57%
US 30% · $1.3M
Single-offer competitions43%
US 8.7% · $939.9K
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

National Aeronautics and Space Administration$189.8K
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES$5.9M
Department of the Air Force· Ocean County, NJ· Construction & real property· Aug 2, 2023 – Jun 8, 2026· FA865823CB004
DIGITAL MATERIAL MANAGEMENT ACCELERATION AND EDUCATION SBIR PHASE III-- STC$2.8M
Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Education & social services· Sep 10, 2024 – Feb 23, 2026· FA868424CB028
FOUNDATIONAL MODEL BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MODELS$2.5M
Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Sep 20, 2024 – May 26, 2026· FA239124CB036
SBIR PHASE III - MODEL BASED SYSTEM ENGINEERING$1.4M
Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 23, 2024 – Apr 13, 2026· FA868924CB001
STC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT SERVICES$189.8K
National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 11, 2025 – Jul 8, 2026· 80NSSC26P0060
STC TWC 2024X HARDWARE SERVER MAINTENANCE SUPPORT RENEWAL$166K
National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Nov 4, 2024 – Dec 1, 2025· 80NSSC25PA120
SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF308

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $893.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

NOBLIS, INC.$893.1K100%
RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

FY2021: $0 paid out · $200K received
FY2022: $0 paid out · $750.1K received
FY2023: $0 paid out · $15.8M received
FY2024: $0 paid out · $24.1M received
FY2025: $0 paid out · $212.4M received
FY2026: $0 paid out · $893.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $254.1M reported

ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$210.3M
GROTON, CT · 5 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$7.7M
MELBOURNE, FL · 9 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
KBR SERVICES, LLC$6.8M
HOUSTON, TX · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

NLIGN ANALYTICS, INC.$7.9M−55% in FY2026
BLUE ASH, OH · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
SILICON MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$8.9M−38% in FY2026
LAKEWOOD, CO · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
ANNO.AI, INC.$5.2M−100% in FY2026
DULUTH, MN · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

Strategic Technology ConsultingAI match · 98%

Lobbying · 2025: $120K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $360K

Lobbying by year

2023$0
4 reports
2024$180K
6 reports
2025$120K
4 reports
2026$60K
2 reports

Top issues

Defense16 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES16 reports
U.S. SENATE16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

CREIGHTON STRATEGIES GROUP$220K
8 reports
Capitol Integration$140K
8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 8800 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2026
S. 4784 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Reported by committee · 2026

1 of 16 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.