Federal contractor · TAMPA, FL

SURVTECH SOLUTIONS, INC.

SURVTECH SOLUTIONS, INC. received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+45% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $8.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GG7BBGBFTWK5
Parent company
SURVTECH SOLUTIONS INC.
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2019
  2. 161.8KFY2020
  3. 240KFY2021
  4. 1.1MFY2022
  5. 2.1MFY2023
  6. -26.3KFY2024
  7. 1.4MFY2025
  8. 2.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.1M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $2.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Palm Beach County, FL· Construction & real property· Mar 13, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· W912EP26FA036
  2. Department of the Army· St. Lucie County, FL· Construction & real property· Mar 7, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· W912EP25F0048
  3. Department of the Army· Palm Beach County, FL· Construction & real property· Aug 9, 2023 – Apr 27, 2026· W912EP23F0180
  4. Department of the Army· Hillsborough County, FL· Construction & real property· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· W912EP26FA064
  5. Department of the Army· Glades County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 10, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· W912EP25FA021
  6. Department of the Army· Sarasota County, FL· Construction & real property· Aug 29, 2025 – Jan 23, 2026· W912EP25FA016

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $187K (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. OMAHA, NE · 1 subaward
  2. CHARLOTTE, NC · 1 subaward
  3. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $153.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $681K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $187K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $2.1M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. NASHVILLE, TN · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. STANLEY-OLSSON JOINT VENTURE$3.5M−98% in FY2026
    CENTENNIAL, CO · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SPARKS, MD · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANLEY CONSULTANTS-STANTEC JV$3.6M−44% in FY2026
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.