Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

SWCA, INCORPORATED

SWCA, INCORPORATED received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $42.7M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($1.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.6M
New awards
14
Sole-source
0.6%
Single offer
51%
UEI
KJ64MREJDNL1
Parent company
SWCA, INCORPORATED
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. SWCA, INCORPORATEDPHOENIX, AZ · Family page
    $1.6M
  2. SWCA INCFLAGSTAFF, AZ
    $0
  3. $0
  4. SWCA, INCORPORATEDPORTLAND, OR
    $0
  5. SWCA, INCORPORATEDLAS VEGAS, NV
    $0
  6. SWCA, INCORPORATEDHONOLULU, HI
    $0
  7. SWCA, INCORPORATEDSALT LAKE CITY, UT
    $0
  8. SWCA, INCORPORATEDSHERIDAN, WY
    -$10K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.6MFY2017
  2. 4.3MFY2018
  3. 4.3MFY2019
  4. 10MFY2020
  5. 1.4MFY2021
  6. 2.2MFY2022
  7. 11.2MFY2023
  8. 3.3MFY2024
  9. 1.8MFY2025
  10. 1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.2M69%
  2. Facilities & utilities$515.6K31%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition52%
    US 39% · $847.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.6%
    US 30% · $9,574
  • Single-offer competitions51%
    US 8.8% · $837.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· Sep 25, 2023 – Feb 17, 2026· 140L4023F0033
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· May 15, 2022 – Aug 12, 2026· 140L0622F0105
  3. Bureau of Land Management· San Juan County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2025 – Aug 6, 2026· 140L4025F0032
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Aug 17, 2020 – Jun 26, 2026· 140L5720F0029
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Salt Lake County, UT· Professional services· Sep 6, 2024 – Sep 25, 2026· 140L0624F0163
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Lincoln County, NV· Professional services· May 15, 2025 – May 15, 2026· 140L3925P0005
  7. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· May 5, 2023 – Apr 28, 2026· 140P2023F0170
  8. National Park Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Jul 24, 2024 – Jun 23, 2026· 140P2024F0280

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.3M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. FLAGSTAFF, AZ · 1 subaward
  2. CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA$99.5K7.6%
    CHANDLER, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $37.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $208.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $996.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $914.4K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $4.9M reported

  1. FLAGSTAFF, AZ · 1 subaward
  2. CINCINNATI, OH · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ABR, INC.$5M−15% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesBureau of Ocean Energy Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+1 more
  2. LOGAN SIMPSON DESIGN INC.$9M−63% in FY2026
    TEMPE, AZ · 2 entities · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesBureau of Reclamation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+1 more
  3. PALEOWEST LLC$9.7M−82% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.