Federal contractor · OXNARD, CA

SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC

No contract obligations recorded for SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $196.5M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DBVDBCAVUFG6
Small businessMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC company family: 2 registered entities, $45.3M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INCUPPER MARLBORO, MD · Family page
    $45.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 36.4MFY2017
  2. 41.4MFY2018
  3. 19.3MFY2019
  4. 28.7MFY2020
  5. 23.5MFY2021
  6. 15.9MFY2022
  7. 22MFY2023
  8. 9.3MFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $7.6M paid out · $39M received
  • FY2022: $4M paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2023: $2.7M paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2024: $3.3M paid out · $6.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

119 companies · $35.9M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 50 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. QINETIQ GROUP CANADA INC$2.3M
    MEDICINE HAT, AB · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $56.4M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 85 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BOWIE, MD · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WOODBRIDGE, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SABRE SYSTEMS, LLC$147.4M−44% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 2 entities · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.$54.3M−63% in FY2026
    BOHEMIA, NY · 2 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SAN DIEGO, CA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SYSTEMS APPLICATION & TECHNOLOGIES INC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. d/b/a SA-TECHAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$90K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$100K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    4 reports
  2. 2024$90K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$10K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE8 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Venable LLP$100K
    9 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.