Federal contractor · ASHEVILLE, NC

TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION

No contract obligations recorded for TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION in FY2026. Since FY2019: $78.1K. It also received $48K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
QE9BTU89LYF4
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11KFY2019
  2. 7.4KFY2024
  3. 59.7KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION received $48K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 4 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 15.631 · Partners for Fish and Wildlife ($48K).

Assistance · FY2026
$48K
New awards
1
Actions
4
Since FY2021
$1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 158KFY2021
  2. 244.5KFY2022
  3. 327.7KFY2023
  4. 246KFY2024
  5. 0FY2025
  6. 48KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$48K100%

Top programs

  1. 15.631 · Partners for Fish and Wildlife$48K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Interior

Largest awards

  1. 15.657 · Endangered Species Recovery Implementation· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Aug 12, 2021 – May 6, 2026· F20AP11795
  2. 15.660 · Candidate Species Conservation· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Aug 8, 2022 – Apr 1, 2026· F22AP02623
  3. 15.631 · Partners for Fish and Wildlife· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Aug 17, 2026 – Aug 17, 2026· F26AC02054
  4. 15.631 · Partners for Fish and Wildlife· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· F20AC10742

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $55K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $220.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $738.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1M reported

  1. SAINT PAUL, MN · 1 subaward
  2. RALEIGH, NC · 1 subaward
  3. MONTGOMERY, AL · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MISSOULA, MT · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. THE ELIZABETH BROWN, LLC$80.7K−100% in FY2026
    BROOMFIELD, CO · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.