Federal contractor · MISSOULA, MT

WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION

WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION received -$17K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−149% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $279K. Its largest customer was National Park Service (-$17K). It also received $85K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
-$17K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MM9VBJM5DLL6
Parent company
WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 24.9KFY2017
  2. 75.3KFY2018
  3. 0FY2019
  4. 62.6KFY2020
  5. 7.2KFY2021
  6. 20KFY2022
  7. 8.5KFY2023
  8. 62.5KFY2024
  9. 34.9KFY2025
  10. -17KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Val Verde County, TX· Professional services· Jun 10, 2024 – Jan 28, 2026· 140P1324F0053
  2. National Park Service· Hutchinson County, TX· Professional services· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· 140P1226F0011

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION received $85K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 10.707 · Research Joint Venture Agreement ($85K).

Assistance · FY2026
$85K
New awards
1
Actions
1
Since FY2022
$325K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 240KFY2022
  2. 85KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$85K100%

Top programs

  1. 10.707 · Research Joint Venture Agreement$85K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 10.707 · Research Joint Venture Agreement· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Jul 30, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026· 26JV11330160024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $171.1K reported

  1. CHEYENNE, WY · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TANGLED BANK CONSERVATION$67.1K−100% in FY2026
    ASHEVILLE, NC · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MISSOULA, MT · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. THE ELIZABETH BROWN, LLC$80.7K−100% in FY2026
    BROOMFIELD, CO · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.