Federal contractor · NEWBURG, MD

TECH WIZARDS, INC

TECH WIZARDS, INC received $16.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $115.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($16.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.4M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
24%
UEI
MLDLZL23M2M6
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.2MFY2017
  2. 4.3MFY2018
  3. 4.6MFY2019
  4. 3.6MFY2020
  5. 10.6MFY2021
  6. 12.7MFY2022
  7. 15.7MFY2023
  8. 24.4MFY2024
  9. 20.4MFY2025
  10. 16.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$16.4M100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$8.9M54%
  2. Professional services$7.5M46%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$7.5M46%
  2. Charles County, MD$5M30%
  3. King George County, VA$3.9M24%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition24%
    US 39% · $3.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions24%
    US 8.8% · $3.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. NSWCDD R DEPARTMENT TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION$41.7M
    Department of the Navy· Charles County, MD· Education & social services· Feb 18, 2022 – May 28, 2026· N0017822F3006
  2. DTA DEVELOPMENT, CONFIGURATION, OPERATION, AND MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT AT SAN DIEGO, CA (TTGP-DTCC/LDTCC/NADTC/FBL-SD, C3F, EWTGPAC-JEWL) YOKOSUKA, JAPAN (FBL-TTGPDY) PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII (FBL-MP) AND EVERETT, WA (FBL-PNW).$30.4M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Jul 5, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· N0024424F3006
  3. THIS SUPPORT WILL PROVIDE ANALYSIS, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND INTEGRATION OF THE COMPUTER AIDED SUB-MODE TRAINING OPEN ARCHITECTURE SUITE AND CAST TO UNITED STATES NAVY AND FMS DISPLAY CONSOLES TO SUPPORT INDIVIDUAL SUB-MODE TRAINING.$21M
    Department of the Navy· King George County, VA· Education & social services· Aug 4, 2020 – May 29, 2026· N0017820F3016
  4. NSWCDD HAS A REQUIREMENT TO SUPPORT THE MISSION OF THE SCSTC. THIS SUPPORT WILL PROVIDE ANALYSIS, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND INTEGRATION OF THE CAST COAST AND CAST IN UNITED STATES NAVY USN FMS DISPLAY CONSOLES TO SUPPORT INDIVIDUAL SUB-MODE TRAINING.$10K
    Department of the Navy· King George County, VA· Education & social services· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 9, 2025· N0017826F3005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $290.3K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $759.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $11.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $16.9M reported

  1. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$5.6M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BOWHEAD PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS, LLC$4.5M
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ACCELINT AI, LLC$2.9M
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 2 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYNECTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.$59.5M−19% in FY2026
    OXNARD, CA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MARINE SYSTEMS CORPORATION$59.7M−12% in FY2026
    BOSTON, MA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GHD-COWI JOINT VENTURE$63.4M−53% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.