Federal contractor · ANN ARBOR, MI

ACCELINT AI, LLC

ACCELINT AI, LLC received $8.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $235.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($6.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.1M
New awards
7
Sole-source
16%
Single offer
71%
UEI
L9Q4Y83HTUM3
Parent company
SOAR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.2MFY2017
  2. 21.7MFY2018
  3. 24.9MFY2019
  4. 34.8MFY2020
  5. 23.1MFY2021
  6. 21.6MFY2022
  7. 50.7MFY2023
  8. 20.1MFY2024
  9. 14.6MFY2025
  10. 8.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$6.4M79%
    3 awards
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$1M13%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Army$642K8.0%
    1 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency-$2830.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$5.8M71%
  2. Research & development$2.3M29%

Where the work was performed

  1. Washtenaw County, MI$6.8M84%
  2. Orange County, FL$1.3M16%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition87%
    US 39% · $7M
  • Sole-source awards16%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions71%
    US 8.8% · $5.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$1.3M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. RRL ATT REQUIREMENT$60.8M
    Department of the Navy· Washtenaw County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 20, 2022 – Apr 15, 2026· N6134022C0024
  2. OBJECTIVE PREDICTION OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS VIA MODELS OF PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES (OP TEMPO)PHASE 1 (BASE)$4.2M
    Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Sep 25, 2024 – Dec 22, 2025· HR001124C0497
  3. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION$4M
    Department of the Army· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Dec 8, 2023 – May 28, 2026· W912CG24C0002
  4. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$1.5M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Feb 21, 2020 – May 20, 2026· N6833520C0307
  5. SBIR PHASE III ACCELERATION OF CONTENT CURRICULUM FOR MISSION ESSENTIAL NAVY FLEET NEEDS.$1.3M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 25, 2026 – Mar 25, 2026· N6134026F1010
  6. LEADERSHIP ASSESSMENT$625.4K
    Department of the Navy· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Nov 17, 2025 – May 13, 2026· N0001426C2401
  7. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF565

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ACCELINT AI, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. -2.6KFY2021

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $3M paid out · $7.9M received
  • FY2022: $3.3M paid out · $833.4K received
  • FY2023: $26.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $614.5K paid out · $736.2K received
  • FY2025: $19.1M paid out · $2.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

39 companies · $52.5M reported

  1. INTEGRATION INNOVATION INC$24.6M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$15.9M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. TECH WIZARDS, INC$2.9M
    NEWBURG, MD · 2 subawards · Business schools and computer and management training

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $12.3M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$7.1M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. BOWHEAD MISSION SOLUTIONS, LLC$2.8M
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. APTIMA INC$727.8K
    WOBURN, MA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CARLEY CORPORATION$14.2M
    ORLANDO, FL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Business schools and computer and management training
  2. NOVACES, LLC$13.4M−54% in FY2026
    NEW ORLEANS, LA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. STEALTH SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$9.4M−68% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.