Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

TECHNICAL AND PROJECT ENGINEERING, LLC

TECHNICAL AND PROJECT ENGINEERING, LLC received $9.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+6.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $132.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($6.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.1M
New awards
4
Sole-source
67%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
QZ8JHPAH38J3
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 22.1MFY2017
  2. 22.4MFY2018
  3. 16.3MFY2019
  4. 17.5MFY2020
  5. 5.1MFY2021
  6. 15.6MFY2022
  7. 4.1MFY2023
  8. 11.7MFY2024
  9. 8.6MFY2025
  10. 9.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$6.5M71%
    2 awards
  2. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency$2.9M32%
    1 awards
  3. Transportation Security Administration-$309K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$9.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$6.1M67%
  2. Prince William County, VA$2.9M32%
  3. Dale County, AL$347.1K3.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition67%
    US 39% · $6.1M
  • Sole-source awards67%
    US 30% · $6.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ARMY TRAINING MODELS SERVICES SUPPORT FOR THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY$12.1M
    Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 5, 2025 – Mar 23, 2026· W91CRB25C0008
  2. FIELD OPERATIONS - BUSINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES$3.9M
    Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency· Prince William County, VA· Professional services· Sep 10, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· HS002125FE082
  3. THE QUOTE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE AWARD. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE QUOTE AND ANY OTHER PROVISION IN THE CONTRACT, CLAUSES, ATTACHMENTS, LAW, OR REGULATION, THE CONFLICTING QUOTE PROVISION WILL BE SUPERSEDED.$1.4M
    Department of the Army· Dale County, AL· Professional services· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· W9124G26FA021
  4. OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION SERVICES FOR SECURE FLIGHT.$1.1M
    Transportation Security Administration· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 27, 2024 – Jul 14, 2026· 70T02024F7500N020

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.5M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$1.1M73%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. CALIBRE SYSTEMS, INC.$399.4K27%
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $85K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $6.7M reported

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$2.9M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$1.8M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CGI FEDERAL INC.$1.1M
    FAIRFAX, VA · 6 subawards · Other support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$26.6M+13% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC$27.9M−11% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN, MD · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.