Federal contractor · HAVRE DE GRACE, MD

TENAX TECHNOLOGIES LLC

TENAX TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $9.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−15% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $54.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.5M
New awards
8
Sole-source
12%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CQHTCHNKGPR4
Small businessWoman-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.8MFY2019
  2. 3.9MFY2020
  3. 3.1MFY2021
  4. 2.3MFY2022
  5. 10MFY2023
  6. 11.5MFY2024
  7. 11.2MFY2025
  8. 9.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$9M95%
  2. Facilities & utilities$360.2K3.8%
  3. Professional services$153.1K1.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards12%
    US 30% · $1.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$36.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Hampton city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 27, 2022 – Mar 23, 2026· FA489023F0026
  2. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Dec 14, 2022 – May 28, 2026· W91ZLK23P0011
  3. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Jul 17, 2023 – Feb 18, 2026· M6890923P7906
  4. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2022 – Apr 17, 2026· W91CRB22C0035
  5. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· W91ZLK26FA052
  6. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Apr 10, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· W91ZLK25F0077
  7. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Sep 19, 2025 – Mar 13, 2026· W91ZLK25P0039
  8. Department of the Navy· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Mar 6, 2025 – May 3, 2026· N0017825F7905

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.1M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $13.4M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 11 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIRA INFORMATION SOLUTIONS LLC$25.8M+11% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ELEVATE GROUP, LLC$24.7M−11% in FY2026
    QUINCY, MA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. INSEQUENCE, INC.$22.7M−96% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.