Federal contractor · RESTON, VA

AGILE DEFENSE, LLC

AGILE DEFENSE, LLC received $85.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 95 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3B. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($39.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$85.5M
New awards
95
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
2.2%
UEI
KRGLGTXRYL94
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 156MFY2017
  2. 103.4MFY2018
  3. 135.7MFY2019
  4. 122.3MFY2020
  5. 99.9MFY2021
  6. 110.3MFY2022
  7. 126.6MFY2023
  8. 163.1MFY2024
  9. 175.6MFY2025
  10. 85.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 73 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 4 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$39.7M46%
  2. IT & telecom$31.4M37%
  3. Professional services$13M15%
  4. Equipment maintenance$1.3M1.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.2%
    US 39% · $1.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions2.2%
    US 8.7% · $1.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.2%
    US 5.1% · $206.3K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Oct 31, 2016 – Apr 28, 2026· HR001115F0002
  2. Department of the Army· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 27, 2019 – May 20, 2026· W911QX19F0075
  3. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· IT & telecom· Aug 11, 2022 – May 6, 2026· W911S022F0227
  4. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· IT & telecom· Nov 29, 2021 – May 21, 2026· W9124P22F0036
  5. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Apr 28, 2023 – May 22, 2026· W15P7T23F0088
  6. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· May 5, 2022 – May 4, 2026· FA873022F0006
  7. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· IT & telecom· Jul 8, 2021 – Dec 18, 2025· W9124P21F0665
  8. Department of the Air Force· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jul 16, 2021 – Apr 23, 2026· FA955021F0002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $24.3M (35 subawards)

26 sub-recipients

  1. STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward
  2. SEV1TECH LLC$3.5M15%
    WOODBRIDGE, VA · 2 subawards
  3. HAVRE DE GRACE, MD · 1 subaward
  4. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward
  5. ADVANCED COMPUTER SERVICES CORPORATION$1.6M6.6%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 3 subawards
  6. GREAT FALLS, VA · 3 subawards
  7. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  8. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  9. B TECHNOLOGY LLC$862.4K3.6%
    AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward
  10. IMPLICIT SOLUTIONS, LLC$856.6K3.5%
    ANNANDALE, VA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $172.5K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 28% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $76.4M paid out · $9.1M received
  • FY2022: $78.7M paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2023: $83.7M paid out · $148 received
  • FY2024: $16.8M paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2025: $37.8M paid out · $637.7K received
  • FY2026: $24.3M paid out · $172.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

126 companies · $317.7M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ROUND ROCK, TX · 25 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 10 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $15.9M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BURLINGTON, MA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  2. BOWHEAD MISSION SOLUTIONS, LLC$433M−52% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 12 entities · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. COLE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.$287.4M−54% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Agile Defense LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$130K
2 reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2026$130K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$130K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.