Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX
TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLC
TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLC received $755K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $63.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($755K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $755K
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- PNMDCGELMWD8
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLC company family: 5 registered entities, -$411.5K in FY2026 together. See the family
- TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLCWARNER ROBINS, GA · Family page-$1.2M
- TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO$50.5K
- TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLCWEST SACRAMENTO, CA$0
- TEPA CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, LLCKANSAS CITY, MO$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3KFY2017
- 9.7MFY2019
- 208.4KFY2020
- 3.1MFY2021
- 27MFY2022
- 8.5MFY2023
- 6.8MFY2024
- 7.6MFY2025
- 755KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$755K100%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$657.5K87%
- Construction & real property$97.5K13%
Where the work was performed
- Cascade County, MT$657.5K87%
- Sarpy County, NE$121.5K16%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Taylor County, TX· Construction & real property· Jun 16, 2022 – Feb 5, 2026· FA890322F0079
- Department of the Air Force· Cascade County, MT· Equipment maintenance· Sep 15, 2023 – May 22, 2026· FA890323F0109
- Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· FA460024F0197
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- JM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC.$34.2M−97% in FY2026TUCSON, AZ · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- SAHARA PALMS INC$35.1M−78% in FY2026FRUITLAND, UT · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- AHTNA-CDM SMITH JV$36.3M−15% in FY2026IRVINE, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.