Federal contractor · WIXOM, MI

TESTEK LLC

TESTEK LLC received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards (−87% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $76.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($742K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
27
Sole-source
98%
Single offer
1.7%
UEI
KJWFZGACBL59
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.1MFY2017
  2. 7.6MFY2018
  3. 6.3MFY2019
  4. 9.1MFY2020
  5. 3.7MFY2021
  6. 8.3MFY2022
  7. 19MFY2023
  8. 6.9MFY2024
  9. 9.8MFY2025
  10. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$742K59%
    14 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$475.2K38%
    10 awards
  3. U.S. Coast Guard$25.8K2.1%
    1 awards
  4. Department of the Air Force$16.2K1.3%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$841.1K67%
  2. Equipment maintenance$349K28%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$69.9K5.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. Oakland County, MI$936K74%
  2. San Diego County, CA$307K24%
  3. Kern County, CA$16.2K1.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99.6%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards98%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions1.7%
    US 8.8% · $21.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$715K
    Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$475.2K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards
  3. U.S. Coast Guard$25.8K
    Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  4. Department of the Air Force$16.2K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. TEST STAND 2 & 3$4.6M
    Department of the Navy· Oakland County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 30, 2022 – Dec 16, 2025· N6852022F0222
  2. AC DC GENERATOR TEST STAND$2M
    Department of the Navy· Oakland County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 29, 2021 – May 27, 2026· N6852021F0141
  3. SUPPORT OF FRCSW, FTE$1.2M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· May 12, 2023 – Apr 28, 2026· N6852023F0136
  4. HOUSING,GEARBOX,TUR$676K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Oakland County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 13, 2025 – Nov 13, 2025· SPRPA126PYA04
  5. HOUSING,GEARBOX,TUR$92.1K
    Department of the Navy· Oakland County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 26, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· N0038324FSY06
  6. HOUSING,GEARBOX,TUR$88K
    Department of the Navy· Oakland County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 14, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· N0038325FSY00
  7. PROVIDE PARTS AND SERVICES ON THE TESTEK HYDRAULIC TEST STATION IN SUPPORT OF THE HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM PROGRAM AT LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT.$75.4K
    Department of the Army· Franklin County, PA· Professional services· Mar 21, 2025 – Apr 27, 2026· W911N225F0302
  8. 8511807083!CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMBLY$33.9K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Oakland County, MI· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 11, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· SPE7L126F2114

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $221.8K (4 subawards)

4 primes

  1. DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS$77.3K35%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION I$55.5K25%
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward
  3. RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION$52.4K24%
    EAST HARTFORD, CT · 1 subaward
  4. GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.$36.6K17%
    STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $725.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $363.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $202.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $822.6K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $221.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. THE BOEING COMPANY$2.7M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 12 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$1.9M
    YORK, PA · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$210.4K
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 35 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAST TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$14.6M−94% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. ORBIT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$9.3M−96% in FY2026
    WARMINSTER, PA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. VENTUREDYNE LTD$9.1M−93% in FY2026
    HOLLAND, MI · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.