Federal contractor · CALGARY

THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY

THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY received $345.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration ($345.8K). It also received $1.5M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$345.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
XC87G4J7F7M8
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 345.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$345.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$345.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $345.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $345.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Food and Drug Administration· Professional services· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 75F40126C00212

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY received $1.5M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 25 actions (1 new awards), −30% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research ($1.5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
1
Actions
25
Since FY2021
$18.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 3.1MFY2021
  2. 3.2MFY2022
  3. 4MFY2023
  4. 4.6MFY2024
  5. 2.2MFY2025
  6. 1.5MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$1.5M100%

Top programs

  1. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$1.5M95%
  2. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders$87.2K5.6%
  3. 12.420 · Military Medical Research and Development-$12K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 17, 2021 – Sep 3, 2026· R01AI165327
  2. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· May 31, 2021 – Aug 13, 2026· R01NS121016
  3. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Jan 31, 2022 – Jun 19, 2026· R01NS109481
  4. 12.420 · Military Medical Research and Development· Defense Health Agency· Project grant· May 26, 2022 – Nov 19, 2025· W81XWH2210468
  5. 12.420 · Military Medical Research and Development· Defense Health Agency· Project grant· Aug 2, 2023 – Mar 5, 2026· HT94252310878
  6. 15.664 · Fish and Wildlife Coordination and Assistance· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Jun 13, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· F25AC01461

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $619.2K (2 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $529.3K (9 subawards)

6 primes

  1. EVANSTON, IL · 2 subawards
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  3. TUSCALOOSA, AL · 1 subaward
  4. PITTSBURGH, PA · 5 subawards
  5. IOWA CITY, IA · 1 subaward
  6. ROSLINDALE, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $7.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

46 companies · $18.9M reported

  1. CINCINNATI, OH · 1 subaward
  2. EVANSTON, IL · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. NEW HAVEN, CT · 4 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. PORTOLA VALLEY, CA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. UPPSALA, SWE · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.