Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

THE INTELLEKT GROUP, LLC

THE INTELLEKT GROUP, LLC received $7.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+116% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $17.4M. Its largest customer was U.S. Marshals Service ($5.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.6M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FUMNCVBLD8H8
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 132.9KFY2018
  2. 114.4KFY2019
  3. 758.7KFY2020
  4. 1.2MFY2021
  5. 90.6KFY2022
  6. 2MFY2023
  7. 2MFY2024
  8. 3.5MFY2025
  9. 7.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Marshals Service$5.5M72%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$2.1M28%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$5.5M72%
  2. IT & telecom$2.1M28%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$5.5M72%
  2. Sarpy County, NE$2.1M28%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. RED SWITCH SUPPORT SERVICE$8.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2023 – May 1, 2026· FA460023F0057
  2. MISSION CRITICAL JUSTIFICATION: CONTRACTOR SERVICES SUPPORT TO ASSIST IN APPREHENDING FUGITIVES$5.5M
    U.S. Marshals Service· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – Aug 14, 2026· 15M10325FA4700089

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $14M (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$12.8M92%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  2. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$1.2M8.3%
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $34.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $14M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $55M reported

  1. LEIDOS, INC.$37.8M
    RESTON, VA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$12.8M
    GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$4.1M
    SPARKS, NV · 7 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THIRD WAVE SYSTEMS, INC.$6.2M−100% in FY2026
    EDEN PRAIRIE, MN · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MKGCS, LLC$5.9M+39% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ONEIL & ASSOCIATES INC$7M−30% in FY2026
    MIAMISBURG, OH · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.