Federal contractor · HOUSTON, TX

THE JANDOR GROUP LLC

THE JANDOR GROUP LLC received $42.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−50% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($45.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$42.8K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CLMGDNJVMW15
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 500KFY2023
  2. 1.3MFY2024
  3. 86.3KFY2025
  4. 42.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$51.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Macon County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Apr 22, 2024 – Apr 13, 2026· W911SA24P3070
  2. Department of the Army· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2024 – Mar 17, 2026· W911SA24P3062
  3. Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services· Harris County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 14, 2024 – May 22, 2026· 12FPC324P0098
  4. Agricultural Research Service· Doña Ana County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Sep 4, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 12805B24P0266
  5. National Park Service· Shawnee County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Sep 12, 2024 – Aug 29, 2026· 140P6024P0039
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Williamson County, TX· Education & social services· Mar 28, 2024 – May 29, 2026· 36C24524C0065

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MARINE TAXONOMIC SERVICES, LIMITED$853.2K−100% in FY2026
    SAN MARCOS, CA · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CONSTRUCTIVE CONFLICT LLC$1.7M−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.