Federal contractor · CHESAPEAKE, VA

THE MCHENRY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC

THE MCHENRY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC received $25.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $272.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($20.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$25.3M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.3%
UEI
PP9MLQ5V8RD5
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.4MFY2017
  2. 4.6MFY2018
  3. 9.6MFY2019
  4. 22MFY2020
  5. 16.6MFY2021
  6. 34.8MFY2022
  7. 45.5MFY2023
  8. 60.6MFY2024
  9. 49.9MFY2025
  10. 25.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$20.9M82%
    15 awards
  2. U.S. Coast Guard$4.5M18%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$25.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ventura County, CA$11.7M46%
  2. San Diego County, CA$6.5M26%
  3. District of Columbia, DC$4.5M18%
  4. Chesapeake city, VA$4.1M16%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.3%
    US 39% · $81K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.3%
    US 8.7% · $81K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CNSL N44 READINESS ASSESSMENT TEAMS FOR ENGINEERING, COMBAT SYSTEMS, INSURV SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) SUPPORT TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE DURING ASSESSMENTS FOR ENHANCED READINESS PERFORMANCE.$38.8M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jul 15, 2024 – May 22, 2026· N0018924F3066
  2. ENGINEERING READINESS ASSISTANCE TEAM (ERAT) AND COMBAT SYSTEM READINESS ASSISTANCE TEAM (CSRAT)$35.5M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jun 20, 2019 – Mar 6, 2026· N0018919F3027
  3. DESIGN SERVICES, SYSTEM HARDWARE DESIGN, MATERIAL KITTING, AND INSTALLATION INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES.$28.9M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Sep 28, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· N6339423F3007
  4. COMBAT SYSTEMS$18.5M
    Department of the Navy· Duval County, FL· Professional services· Jul 2, 2020 – Feb 12, 2026· N4002720F3002
  5. NATIONAL SECURITY CUTTER OBTAINS CONTRACTOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE USCG.$13.4M
    U.S. Coast Guard· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 25, 2024 – Sep 4, 2026· 70Z02324F93210001
  6. CNSL/CNSP HAS A REQUIREMENT FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSONNEL, MATERIAL AND FACILITIES REQUIRED TO DEVELOP, MAINTAIN AND CONDUCT MAINTENANCE UNIVERSITY (MU) TRAINING.$9.6M
    Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Nov 24, 2021 – Feb 24, 2026· N0018922F3003
  7. TYCOM MATERIAL INSPECTION AND TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR COMMANDER NAVAL SURFACE FORCES, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET$6.5M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2025 – Mar 27, 2026· N0024425F3015
  8. N104C/PM4 TONY LANZAROTTA USNS COMFORT ELEVATOR CONTROLLERS DESIGN AND BUILD$5.4M
    Department of the Navy· Chesapeake city, VA· Professional services· Aug 18, 2022 – Mar 12, 2026· N3220522P4082

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $3.6M paid out · $9.6M received
  • FY2023: $10.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $12.8M paid out · $85.8K received
  • FY2025: $1.4M paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

10 companies · $27.9M reported

  1. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$14.2M
    MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SERCO INC$9.6M
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. THE KENIFIC GROUP LLC$1.6M
    LEESBURG, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $11.1M reported

  1. SERCO INC$5.4M
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EPSILON SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS INC$4.5M
    PORTSMOUTH, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. NOBLIS, INC.$1M
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HIGHBURY DEFENSE GROUP$122.1M−67% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGINEERING SERVICES NETWORK INC$112M−68% in FY2026
    WOODBRIDGE, VA · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CRL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$110.1M−11% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.