Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY received -$13.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (-$13.2K). It also received $48.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
-$13.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
THG1JDUEQKQ8
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 241.3KFY2017
  2. 37KFY2018
  3. 19.6KFY2019
  4. 57.2KFY2020
  5. 439.8KFY2021
  6. 97.8KFY2022
  7. 138.9KFY2023
  8. 51.8KFY2024
  9. -13.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Mar 31, 2023 – Jul 20, 2026· 140F0S23F0019
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Wake County, NC· Professional services· Feb 8, 2021 – Apr 17, 2026· 140F0421P0044

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY received $48.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 150 actions (23 new awards). Its largest program was 10.701 · Stewardship Agreements ($19.3M).

Assistance · FY2026
$48.2M
New awards
23
Actions
150
Since FY2021
$513M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 39.2MFY2021
  2. 42.5MFY2022
  3. 247.4MFY2023
  4. 163.6MFY2024
  5. -27.9MFY2025
  6. 48.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$42.1M87%
  2. Grants$6.1M13%

Top programs

  1. 10.701 · Stewardship Agreements$19.3M40%
  2. 10.699 · Partnership Agreements$14.7M31%
  3. 10.729 · Inflation Reduction Act - National Forest System$6M12%
  4. 12.017 · Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration (REPI) Program$4.3M8.9%
  5. 10.724 · Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes$2.1M4.4%
  6. 12.610 · Community Economic Adjustment Assistance for Compatible Use and Joint Land Use Studies$1.2M2.5%
  7. 15.654 · National Wildlife Refuge System Enhancements$621K1.3%
  8. 15.247 · Wildlife Resource Management$600K1.2%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of the Interior
  4. Department of the Interior
  5. Department of Commerce

Largest awards

  1. 12.610 · Community Economic Adjustment Assistance for Compatible Use and Joint Land Use Studies· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Feb 16, 2022 – Aug 27, 2026· W9124J1520005
  2. 11.463 · Habitat Conservation· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Sep 16, 2024 – Aug 11, 2026· NA24NMFX463C0055
  3. 11.463 · Habitat Conservation· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jun 21, 2023 – Nov 19, 2025· NA23NMF4630056
  4. 11.463 · Habitat Conservation· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Aug 8, 2024 – Dec 29, 2025· NA24NMFX463C0078
  5. 15.945 · Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System· National Park Service· Cooperative agreement· Sep 10, 2022 – Jul 2, 2026· P22AC02126
  6. 10.701 · Stewardship Agreements· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Jun 29, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 26SA11080300061

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $16.7M (38 subawards)

35 sub-recipients

  1. SAVANNA INSTITUTE$2.4M14%
    MADISON, WI · 1 subaward
  2. PROPAGATE GROUP, PBC$2.3M14%
    GREAT BARRINGTON, MA · 1 subaward
  3. BLACKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward
  4. COLUMBIA, MO · 1 subaward
  5. GREATER NEWARK CONSERVANCY INC$1.2M7.0%
    NEWARK, NJ · 2 subawards
  6. DURHAM, NC · 1 subaward
  7. TUSKEGEE INSTITUTE, AL · 1 subaward
  8. IRONBOUND COMMUNITY CORPORATION$723.8K4.3%
    NEWARK, NJ · 1 subaward
  9. NEWARK, NJ · 1 subaward
  10. THE WATERSHED RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTER$546.8K3.3%
    HAYFORK, CA · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $15.9M (52 subawards)

20 primes

  1. WASHINGTON, DC · 31 subawards
  2. BISMARCK, ND · 1 subaward
  3. SAINT PAUL, MN · 2 subawards
  4. NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION$421.1K2.6%
    LOWELL, MA · 1 subaward
  5. SANTA FE, NM · 2 subawards
  6. HONOLULU, HI · 1 subaward
  7. LITTLE ROCK, AR · 1 subaward
  8. LACEY, WA · 1 subaward
  9. BOZEMAN, MT · 1 subaward
  10. GREENVILLE, NC · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $6.6M paid out · $9M received
  • FY2022: $4M paid out · $15.6M received
  • FY2023: $6.2M paid out · $22.2M received
  • FY2024: $19M paid out · $18.7M received
  • FY2025: $14.6M paid out · $245.2M received
  • FY2026: $16.7M paid out · $15.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

142 companies · $67M reported

  1. PROPAGATE GROUP, PBC$3.2M
    GREAT BARRINGTON, MA · 2 subawards
  2. SAVANNA INSTITUTE$2.9M
    MADISON, WI · 2 subawards
  3. PLATAFORMA NUUP, A.C.$2.8M
    CIUDAD DE MEXICO, MX · 4 subawards

Primes that pay it

90 companies · $326.6M reported

  1. RALEIGH, NC · 1 subaward
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 165 subawards
  3. FORT COLLINS, CO · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • The Nature ConservancyAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$5M
37 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$11.8M
$11.8M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.7M
    28 reports
  2. 2024$2.5M
    33 reports
  3. 2025$5M
    37 reports
  4. 2026$1.6M
    21 reports

Top issues

  1. Real estate, land use and conservation39 reports
  2. Agriculture37 reports
  3. Energy and nuclear37 reports
  4. Natural resources37 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations34 reports
  6. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code31 reports
  7. Environment and Superfund21 reports
  8. Clean air and water20 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE105 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES99 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Natural Resource Results LLC$705K
    15 reports
  2. BlueWater Strategies$260K
    14 reports
  3. Alignment Government Strategies$240K
    14 reports
  4. American Capitol Group$230K
    14 reports
  5. Michael Best Strategies LLC$220K
    2 reports
  6. BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS$150K
    3 reports
  7. Policy Integration Partners, LLC$120K
    6 reports
  8. AgVantage LLC$100K
    14 reports

12 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.