Federal contractor · LAS VEGAS, NV
THE SIEGEL GROUP, LLC
THE SIEGEL GROUP, LLC received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $51.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.1M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 38%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- K4MLV1TDKJ74
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.1MFY2017
- 2.9MFY2018
- 5.8MFY2019
- 6.1MFY2020
- 7.3MFY2021
- 7.6MFY2022
- 8MFY2023
- 5.4MFY2024
- 4.5MFY2025
- 2.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$1.3M62%1 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$522.8K25%2 awards
- Department of the Army$249.7K12%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$1.3M62%
- Professional services$772.5K38%
Where the work was performed
- Norfolk city, VA$1.3M62%
- San Luis Obispo County, CA$522.8K25%
- Franklin County, OH$222.7K11%
- Dane County, WI$27K1.3%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition38%US 39% · $772.5K
- Sole-source awards38%US 30% · $772.5K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Feb 25, 2022 – Feb 26, 2026· N5005422C0003
- Federal Acquisition Service· San Luis Obispo County, CA· Professional services· Sep 18, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· 47QFWA23C0009
- Federal Acquisition Service· San Luis Obispo County, CA· Professional services· Sep 18, 2023 – Aug 24, 2026· 47QFWA23C0010
- Department of the Army· Franklin County, OH· Professional services· May 30, 2025 – Mar 25, 2026· W9136425PA044
- Department of the Army· Dane County, WI· Professional services· Dec 27, 2024 – Dec 31, 2025· W912J225PA003
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $1.3M (1 subaward)
1 prime
- OLATHE, KS · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $570.1K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $1.8M reported
- ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
- AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$570.1KGERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Warehousing and storage
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORPORATION$13.8M−81% in FY2026CHIYODA-KU, JPN · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- HHS GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC$5.9M+141% in FY2026DRIPPING SPRINGS, TX · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Facilities support services
- MITOMO MARUTAKA JV$4.1M+1,327% in FY2026OKINAWA-SHI, JPN · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.