Federal contractor · LAS VEGAS, NV

THE SIEGEL GROUP, LLC

THE SIEGEL GROUP, LLC received $2.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $51.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
38%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K4MLV1TDKJ74
Small businessVeteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.1MFY2017
  2. 2.9MFY2018
  3. 5.8MFY2019
  4. 6.1MFY2020
  5. 7.3MFY2021
  6. 7.6MFY2022
  7. 8MFY2023
  8. 5.4MFY2024
  9. 4.5MFY2025
  10. 2.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.3M62%
  2. Professional services$772.5K38%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $772.5K
  • Sole-source awards38%
    US 30% · $772.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Feb 25, 2022 – Feb 26, 2026· N5005422C0003
  2. Federal Acquisition Service· San Luis Obispo County, CA· Professional services· Sep 18, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· 47QFWA23C0009
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· San Luis Obispo County, CA· Professional services· Sep 18, 2023 – Aug 24, 2026· 47QFWA23C0010
  4. Department of the Army· Franklin County, OH· Professional services· May 30, 2025 – Mar 25, 2026· W9136425PA044
  5. Department of the Army· Dane County, WI· Professional services· Dec 27, 2024 – Dec 31, 2025· W912J225PA003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.3M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. OLATHE, KS · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $570.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.8M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  2. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Warehousing and storage

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE CORPORATION$13.8M−81% in FY2026
    CHIYODA-KU, JPN · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. HHS GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC$5.9M+141% in FY2026
    DRIPPING SPRINGS, TX · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Facilities support services
  3. MITOMO MARUTAKA JV$4.1M+1,327% in FY2026
    OKINAWA-SHI, JPN · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.