Federal contractor · YPSILANTI, MI

THE STRATAGEM GROUP LLC

THE STRATAGEM GROUP LLC received $8.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $90.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($8.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.9M
New awards
9
Sole-source
15%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G38PSM4NJ477
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $8.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. THE STRATAGEM GROUP LLCYPSILANTI, MI · Family page
    $8.9M
  2. $500
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.8MFY2017
  2. 4.5MFY2018
  3. 8.2MFY2019
  4. 9.6MFY2020
  5. 16.4MFY2021
  6. 9MFY2022
  7. 5.5MFY2023
  8. 12.7MFY2024
  9. 13.2MFY2025
  10. 8.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$7.6M85%
  2. Professional services$1.3M15%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition15%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards15%
    US 30% · $1.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Jun 28, 2023 – Feb 4, 2026· FA875023C1507
  2. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Aug 8, 2019 – Nov 19, 2025· FA875019C1502
  3. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Sep 30, 2021 – Nov 19, 2025· FA875021C1523
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Jul 10, 2020 – Nov 19, 2025· FA875020C1520
  5. Department of the Air Force· Washtenaw County, MI· Professional services· May 28, 2024 – May 22, 2026· FA811024C0001
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· May 28, 2019 – Nov 19, 2025· N0001419C2032
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· Research & development· Aug 24, 2018 – Nov 19, 2025· FA865018C7872
  8. Defense Contract Management Agency· Washtenaw County, MI· IT & telecom· Oct 24, 2016 – Nov 19, 2025· FA861615C6099

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $8.2M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $6.7M reported

  1. BEAVERCREEK, OH · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORP$31.1M−79% in FY2026
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. IDAHO SCIENTIFIC LLC$32.4M−66% in FY2026
    BOISE, ID · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. GENEVA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$33.1M+65% in FY2026
    MONUMENT, CO · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.