Federal contractor · LIBBY, MT

THOMPSON CONTRACTING, INC.

THOMPSON CONTRACTING, INC. received $3.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (+492% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.9M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($3.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.3M
New awards
14
Sole-source
5.1%
Single offer
6.3%
UEI
EX6HJMAZJYL5
Parent company
THOMPSON CONTRACTING INC
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 351.7KFY2017
  2. 1.5MFY2018
  3. 374.2KFY2019
  4. 474.4KFY2020
  5. 237KFY2021
  6. 371.5KFY2022
  7. 4.6MFY2023
  8. 7.1MFY2024
  9. 553KFY2025
  10. 3.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.1M93%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$166.9K5.1%
  3. Equipment maintenance$55.8K1.7%
  4. Facilities & utilities$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Idaho County, ID$127.6K3.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition11%
    US 39% · $372.4K
  • Sole-source awards5.1%
    US 30% · $166.9K
  • Single-offer competitions6.3%
    US 8.7% · $205.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Forest Service· Suffolk County, NY· Construction & real property· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· 1240LU26C0003
  2. Forest Service· Gallatin County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2024 – Mar 3, 2026· 1282B124F0144
  3. Forest Service· Idaho County, ID· Construction & real property· Sep 20, 2024 – Aug 24, 2026· 1240LU24F0071
  4. Forest Service· Lincoln County, MT· Construction & real property· May 19, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 1240LU26F0055
  5. Forest Service· Flathead County, MT· Construction & real property· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· 1240LU26F0011
  6. Forest Service· Sanders County, MT· Construction & real property· Jan 3, 2024 – Mar 23, 2026· 1282B124F0012
  7. Forest Service· Flathead County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 25, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026· 1240LU26F0096
  8. Department of the Army· Lincoln County, MT· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 10, 2026 – Feb 10, 2026· W912DW26PA020

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $200.1K reported

  1. IDAHO FALLS, ID · 1 subaward · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JILK HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, INC.$9.2M−98% in FY2026
    BREA, CA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  2. MACAULEY CONSTRUCTION INC$9.7M+2,441% in FY2026
    PLACERVILLE, CA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  3. BROWNSVILLE, CA · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.