Federal contractor · LEAVENWORTH, KS

TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES AND SUPPORT, INC.

TRAINING TECHNOLOGIES AND SUPPORT, INC. received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.9M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($951.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$2M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
12%
UEI
E4GKFN5NJT23
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -1.1KFY2017
  2. 500.6KFY2018
  3. 2.5MFY2019
  4. 4.3MFY2020
  5. 4.8MFY2021
  6. 4MFY2022
  7. 2.1MFY2023
  8. 1.3MFY2024
  9. 1.6MFY2025
  10. 2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M60%
  2. Professional services$805.1K40%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cass County, ND$232.6K12%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition12%
    US 39% · $232.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions12%
    US 8.7% · $232.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Jefferson County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Feb 12, 2025 – Jul 9, 2026· 36C24725F0106
  2. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Professional services· Sep 12, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· W91QF424F0319
  3. Agricultural Research Service· Cass County, ND· Facilities & utilities· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 1232SA26F0425
  4. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Professional services· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W91QF426FA107
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Leavenworth County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Aug 28, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· 36C77025N0071
  6. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Professional services· May 13, 2026 – May 13, 2026· W91QF426FA103
  7. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Professional services· Sep 22, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W91QF425FA184

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $103.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $475.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $103.5K reported

  1. EL PASO, TX · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $475.7K reported

  1. LEAVENWORTH, KS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SGK GLOBAL SERVICES LLC$2.3M+503,112% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, TX · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. HUNATEKPANUM JV, LLC$2.5M−32% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CRUXDCG LLC$5.2M−86% in FY2026
    ROSEVILLE, CA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.