Federal contractor · LAS VEGAS, NV

TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION received $170.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.7B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($139.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$170.7M
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.8%
UEI
XDC4K4U6LDK6
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $170.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONLAS VEGAS, NV · Family page
    $170.7M
  2. COMBINED TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLCALBUQUERQUE, NM
    $0
  3. TRAX INTERNATIONAL, LLCWHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NM
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 153.7MFY2017
  2. 160.8MFY2018
  3. 149.7MFY2019
  4. 185.6MFY2020
  5. 161.4MFY2021
  6. 168.5MFY2022
  7. 157.2MFY2023
  8. 180.6MFY2024
  9. 209.7MFY2025
  10. 170.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$139.9M82%
    6 awards
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$28M16%
    2 awards
  3. USTRANSCOM$2.9M1.7%
    1 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$143.1M84%
  2. Research & development$24.7M14%
  3. Transportation & logistics$2.9M1.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Yuma County, AZ$86.4M51%
  2. Harford County, MD$52.1M31%
  3. Prince George's County, MD$28M16%
  4. Berkeley County, SC$2.9M1.7%
  5. Abroad$1.4M0.8%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.8%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.8%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MISSION TEST SUPPORT SERVICES$759.5M
    Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Research & development· May 30, 2018 – Apr 1, 2026· W9124R18C0001
  2. GODDARD LOGISTICS AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES PLACE OF PERF: GSFC, WFF AND NASA HQ *THIS CONTRACT IS REISSUED FROM NNG17AZ11C*$405.6M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Jun 26, 2017 – Jul 16, 2026· 80GSFC17C0010
  3. MTSS-YUMA PROVING GROUND TASK ORDER #2 FOR BASE PERIOD OF 10 MONTHS FULL PERFORMANCE$83M
    Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Professional services· Feb 12, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· W51EW726FA003
  4. GODDARD LOGISTICS SERVICES CONTRACT - THE PRINCIPAL PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO SUPPORT NASA GSFC LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT NEEDS IN ORDER TO MEET EARTH SCIENCE, SPACE SCIENCE, AND EXPLORATION MISSION REQUIREMENTS.$67.8M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Jul 3, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 80GSFC24CA042
  5. ABERDEEN TEST CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES$65M
    Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Apr 1, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· W91CRB25F0160
  6. ABERDEEN TEST SUPPORT SERVICES ORDERING PERIOD 3$38.9M
    Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Apr 1, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· W91CRB26FA140
  7. AERIAL DELIVERY SERVICES$11.2M
    USTRANSCOM· Berkeley County, SC· Transportation & logistics· Jun 6, 2022 – Mar 10, 2026· HTC71122CC004
  8. TROPIC TEST SUPPORT SERVICES - LABOR$3.9M
    Department of the Army· Professional services· Nov 21, 2024 – May 19, 2026· W9124R25C0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $192.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2024: $105K paid out · $2,282 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $105K reported

  1. ANALEX CORPORATION$105K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $2.2M reported

  1. LEIDOS, INC.$1.8M
    RESTON, VA · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$194.7K
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 2 subawards
  3. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$134.5K
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$444.1M−65% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 entities · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TCOM, L.P.$878.4M−88% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DCS CORPORATION$929.6M−50% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 4 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.