Federal contractor · DAYTON, OH

TRIMBLE INC

TRIMBLE INC received $921.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $130.7M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($285.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$921.2K
New awards
25
Sole-source
21%
Single offer
51%
UEI
PGCSXZ1SSA68
Parent company
TRIMBLE INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

9 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. TRIMBLE INCDAYTON, OH · Family page
    $921.2K
  2. TRIMBLE MAPS INC.PRINCETON, NJ
    $604.7K
  3. TRIMBLE INC.SUNNYVALE, CA
    $38.2K
  4. $3,865
  5. ADVANCED PUBLIC SAFETY, INC.DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
    $0
  6. APPLANIX LLCHOUSTON, TX
    $0
  7. E-BUILDER, INC.SUNRISE, FL
    $0
  8. GEOLINE, INC.BELLEVUE, WA
    $0
  9. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 37.4MFY2017
  2. 16.5MFY2018
  3. 8.3MFY2019
  4. 14MFY2020
  5. 9.5MFY2021
  6. 15.2MFY2022
  7. 14.5MFY2023
  8. 8.3MFY2024
  9. 5.9MFY2025
  10. 921.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$285.7K31%
    4 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$601.5K65%
  2. IT & telecom$235.1K26%
  3. Education & social services$84.7K9.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Iron County, UT$122.1K13%
  2. 69$64.3K7.0%
  3. Mesa County, CO$60.4K6.6%
  4. Yuma County, AZ$59.7K6.5%
  5. Ada County, ID$21.7K2.4%
  6. Abroad$20.4K2.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition72%
    US 39% · $666.2K
  • Sole-source awards21%
    US 30% · $193.8K
  • Single-offer competitions51%
    US 8.8% · $472.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Montgomery County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 23, 2025 – Aug 4, 2026· 70Z04425FC2PL0013
  2. National Park Service· Montgomery County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 23, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026· 140P2126F0072
  3. Forest Service· Iron County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 12760426F0099
  4. Forest Service· Ramsey County, MN· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 12760426P4000
  5. Forest Service· Montgomery County, OH· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· 12760425F0120
  6. U.S. Geological Survey· Nevada County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 27, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· 140G0326F0121
  7. Bureau of Reclamation· Mesa County, CO· IT & telecom· Jun 15, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· 140R4026F0052
  8. Bureau of Reclamation· Yuma County, AZ· IT & telecom· Sep 3, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 140R3026F0087

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $298.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $942.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $343.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

14 companies · $49.1M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 102 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 18 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 37 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 59 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RIYADH, SAU · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. LDIA HOLDINGS, LLC$12.6M−49% in FY2026
    AUSTIN, TX · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Communications equipment manufacturingAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. ISTANBUL, TUR · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of TRIMBLE INC (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Trimble Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$450K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$900K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$570K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$450K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology19 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Intelligence and surveillance4 reports
  5. Telecommunications4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$1.4M
    14 reports
  2. WayPoint Consulting, LLC$720K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.