Federal contractor · GOOSE CREEK, SC

TRU SIMULATION + TRAINING INC

No contract obligations recorded for TRU SIMULATION + TRAINING INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $69.9M. Its largest customer was Defense Contract Management Agency ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DC2JUKFHNLN3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TRU SIMULATION + TRAINING INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $115.6K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TRU SIMULATION + TRAINING INC.ODESSA, FL · Family page
    $115.6K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 20MFY2017
  2. 12.8MFY2018
  3. 2.4MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 376.2KFY2021
  6. -576.4KFY2022
  7. 280.6KFY2023
  8. 21.8MFY2024
  9. 10.5MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. B-1 TRAINING SYSTEM, 2012 FOLLOW-ON - AAI$98.5M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Berkeley County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Oct 20, 2016 – Jan 6, 2026· FA862112C6266

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $796.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $10.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $55.7M reported

  1. BELL TEXTRON INC$33.4M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 13 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. THE BOEING COMPANY$12.5M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 4 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC$7.6M
    SPARKS, NV · 15 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENVISION TECHNOLOGY, LLC$139.6M+19% in FY2026
    MANCHESTER, NH · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  2. BGI-ASI JV, LLC$60.5M−56% in FY2026
    MT PLEASANT, SC · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
  3. TRIJICON, INC.$45.1M+3.7% in FY2026
    WIXOM, MI · 2 entities · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.