Federal contractor · HANOVER, NH

TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE

TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE received $507.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+136% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($349.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$507.8K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MW3ENVJN9ML8
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE company family: 2 registered entities, $5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGEHANOVER, NH · Family page
    $4.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 63.3KFY2018
  2. 119.8KFY2019
  3. 0FY2020
  4. 9.9KFY2021
  5. 48KFY2022
  6. 48KFY2023
  7. 58KFY2024
  8. 214.9KFY2025
  9. 507.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$349.9K69%
  2. Education & social services$157.9K31%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $507.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $507.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Grafton County, NH· Research & development· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W913E526PA004
  2. Department of the Navy· Grafton County, NH· Education & social services· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· N0622A26FA314

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $357K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ · 1 subaward
  2. MADISON, WI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $299.5K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $988K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $292.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $334K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $357K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

147 companies · $101.8M reported

  1. MADISON, WI · 28 subawards
  2. LEBANON, NH · 240 subawards
  3. ROCKVILLE, MD · 2 subawards

Primes that pay it

133 companies · $106.9M reported

  1. DURHAM, NH · 39 subawards
  2. LAUREL, MD · 10 subawards
  3. LEBANON, NH · 34 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GAINESVILLE, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. ELECTRA.AERO INC.$7.8M−100% in FY2026
    MANASSAS, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. YANK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$5.8M+52% in FY2026
    BROOKLYN, NY · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.