Federal contractor · KANSAS CITY, MO

TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (−80% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $74.4M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.6M
New awards
25
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.4%
UEI
D1M5NDD3LLL7
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $3.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLCKANSAS CITY, MO · Family page
    $1.6M
  2. TUKUH TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLCKANSAS CITY, MO
    $1.6M
  3. TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.2MFY2017
  2. 8.9MFY2018
  3. 10.2MFY2019
  4. 3.7MFY2020
  5. 6.2MFY2021
  6. 4.9MFY2022
  7. 4.2MFY2023
  8. 9.2MFY2024
  9. 8.2MFY2025
  10. 1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Land Management$1.3M79%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$189.6K12%
    19 awards
  3. Environmental Protection Agency$90.6K5.5%
    3 awards
  4. Federal Emergency Management Agency$72.5K4.4%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Army$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.6M96%
  2. IT & telecom$72.5K4.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jefferson County, CO$1.3M79%
  2. Abroad$253.7K15%
  3. San Francisco County, CA$90.6K5.5%
  4. Jackson County, MO$72.5K4.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.5%
    US 39% · $8,404
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$64.1K
  • Single-offer competitions4.4%
    US 8.8% · $72.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force-$64.1K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. PASER ROAD ASSESSMENTS$3.9M
    Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 19, 2024 – Apr 15, 2026· 140L0124F0107
  2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE GEOSPATIAL SOLUTIONS THAT HAVE THE ABILITY TO SUPPORT ALL AF GEOSPATIAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SC.$1.3M
    Department of the Air Force· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2024 – May 29, 2026· FA441824F0147
  3. SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (SUAS) STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT, PROGRAM ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT, MISSION INTEGRATION AND PROGRAM EXECUTION SUPPORT$853.7K
    Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Sep 30, 2025 – Apr 30, 2026· FA527025F0159
  4. ADDING ONE LEVEL 3 COUNTRY MANAGER TO SUPPORT EUCOM INTERNATIONAL TRAINING OPERATIONS AND TWO MISSION TRAINING PROGRAM MANAGERS TO SUPPORT CETCOM INTERNATIONAL TRAINING OPERATIONS$754.7K
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jul 22, 2024 – Jun 8, 2026· FA300224F0109
  5. PROVIDE OF FUNDING FOR THE NEW SUPERFUND DIVISION GIS TASK ORDER$723.6K
    Environmental Protection Agency· San Francisco County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2024 – Nov 18, 2025· 68HE0924F0117
  6. EPRISMS SUSTAINMENT UPDATE FOR US ARMY RESERVE (USAR) 2023$650.8K
    Department of the Army· Cass County, MO· Professional services· Sep 20, 2023 – Oct 21, 2025· W912BV23F0163
  7. TO ADD FUNDING TO THE NEW GIS CONTRACT - GENERAL GIS TASK ORDER$470K
    Environmental Protection Agency· San Francisco County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2024 – Mar 27, 2026· 68HE0924F0120
  8. AFSAT MANPOWER SUPPORT - ADMIN FUNDED$464.1K
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Aug 21, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· FA300223F0146

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $254.5K reported

  1. TSG SOLUTIONS, INC.$254.5K
    CARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHOULDER 2 SHOULDER INC$17.2M−76% in FY2026
    CLARKSBURG, MD · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GROUP 70 GUSHIKEN A-E, LLP$6.6M+132% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. UNLABEL INNOVATION LLC$6.3M−19% in FY2026
    HOPKINS, MN · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.