Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

TUNISTA OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES LLC

TUNISTA OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES LLC received $6.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−61% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $28.8M. Its largest customer was Federal Communications Commission ($3.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.2M
New awards
12
Sole-source
56%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XZ8GM5XMQYK7
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TUNISTA SERVICES, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TUNISTA SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $738.3K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2023
  2. 4.6MFY2024
  3. 15.8MFY2025
  4. 6.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 8 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$5.9M96%
  2. Transportation & logistics$275.9K4.4%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition56%
    US 39% · $3.5M
  • Sole-source awards56%
    US 30% · $3.5M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Communications Commission· District of Columbia, DC· Facilities & utilities· Feb 15, 2023 – Jul 1, 2026· 273FCC23C0003
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 29, 2025 – May 14, 2026· SPE60325C5011
  3. Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Jul 31, 2024 – May 14, 2026· W9124C24C0009
  4. Department of the Air Force· Sarpy County, NE· Facilities & utilities· Mar 18, 2026 – May 28, 2026· FA460026P0022
  5. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Feb 23, 2026 – May 13, 2026· FA700026F0050
  6. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· FA700026F0071
  7. Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Transportation & logistics· Oct 23, 2024 – Apr 13, 2026· W912D025C0002
  8. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Nov 26, 2025 – Jan 30, 2026· FA700026F0005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DURHAM, NH · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storageAir Force · Facilities support services
  2. MARENGO, LLC$15.7M−40% in FY2026
    MARENGO, IN · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  3. AWALI, BHR · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.