Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

TUNISTA SERVICES, LLC

TUNISTA SERVICES, LLC received $738.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+119% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $188.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($738.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$738.3K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MUBLKMZPR8R5
Parent company
CALISTA EDUCATION AND CULTURE, INC.
Other than small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $7M in FY2026 together.

  1. TUNISTA SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $738.3K
  2. $6.2M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 19.7MFY2017
  2. 30.9MFY2018
  3. 37.1MFY2019
  4. 33.2MFY2020
  5. 26MFY2021
  6. 16.1MFY2022
  7. 16.8MFY2023
  8. 7.6MFY2024
  9. 336.4KFY2025
  10. 738.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$738.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Nov 25, 2020 – Jun 9, 2026· FA300221F0024
  2. Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Feb 27, 2023 – Mar 5, 2026· FA500023P0018
  3. Department of the Air Force· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Sep 27, 2019 – Jun 4, 2026· FA300219FA207

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DURHAM, NH · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storageAir Force · Facilities support services
  2. MARENGO, LLC$15.7M−40% in FY2026
    MARENGO, IN · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  3. AWALI, BHR · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.