Federal contractor · LEITCHFIELD, KY
UD CONTRACTING INC
UD CONTRACTING INC received $203.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $123.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($203.2K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $203.2K
- New awards
- 24
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 44%
- UEI
- JWEMUM8429K1
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 389.3KFY2017
- 3.5MFY2018
- 6.9MFY2019
- 19MFY2020
- 16.7MFY2021
- 22.4MFY2022
- 17.3MFY2023
- 28.6MFY2024
- 8.8MFY2025
- 203.2KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$203.2K100%24 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$203.2K100%
Where the work was performed
- Hardin County, KY$105.4K52%
- Grayson County, KY$90K44%
- Richmond County, GA$7,7853.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition35%US 39% · $71.2K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · -$18.8K
- Single-offer competitions44%US 8.8% · $90K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · -$18.8K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· Construction & real property· May 22, 2024 – Mar 19, 2026· W9124D24F0241
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Construction & real property· Aug 27, 2024 – Apr 8, 2026· W9124924F0184
- Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2024 – Apr 29, 2026· W9124D24F0511
- Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· Construction & real property· Sep 4, 2025 – May 29, 2026· W9124D25FA204
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· W9124925FA121
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Professional services· Sep 8, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W9124925FA100
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Professional services· Aug 14, 2025 – Jan 22, 2026· W9124925FA077
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· W9124925FA120
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $54.4K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $41.7K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $475.7K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $571.9K reported
- TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$475.7KCOLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
- FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Other support services
- FAYETTEVILLE, NC · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TIP TOP CONSTRUCTION CORP$28.7M−100% in FY2026CHRISTIANSTED, VI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- S & M SAKAMOTO INC$28.9MHONOLULU, HI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
- KUMSUNG CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.$27.3M−100% in FY2026DAEJEON, KOR · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.