Federal contractor · LOS ANGELES, CA

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

No contract obligations recorded for UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CUZLU9MD6CC5
Parent company
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA company family: 3 registered entities, $24.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIALOS ANGELES, CA · Family page
    $24.5M
  2. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMARINA DEL REY, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

485 companies · $820M reported

  1. LEGG GEOPHYSICAL INC.$131.5M
    HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 1 subaward
  2. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, THE$102.3M
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 43 subawards
  3. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$27.8M
    OAKLAND, CA · 176 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

215 companies · $451.5M reported

  1. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES$36.5M
    MATHER, CA · 29 subawards
  2. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, THE$24.5M
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 37 subawards
  3. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$22.7M
    NASHVILLE, TN · 32 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$43.4M−73% in FY2026
    HOUGHTON, MI · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. VRC METAL SYSTEMS, LLC$34.2M+142% in FY2026
    BOX ELDER, SD · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. TEXAS A&M ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION$41.1M−77% in FY2026
    COLLEGE STATION, TX · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Colleges, universities, and professional schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • University of Southern CaliforniaAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$220K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$630K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    6 reports
  2. 2024$220K
    6 reports
  3. 2025$100K
    3 reports
  4. 2026$190K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense10 reports
  2. Education9 reports
  3. Science and technology2 reports
  4. Transportation2 reports
  5. Veterans2 reports
  6. Economics and economic development1 reports
  7. Health issues1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports
  3. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)1 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports
  5. Education - Dept of1 reports
  6. Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports
  7. Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)1 reports
  8. Labor - Dept of (DOL)1 reports
  9. State - Dept of (DOS)1 reports
  10. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$420K
    11 reports
  2. King & Spalding LLP$160K
    1 reports
  3. DGA Group Government Relations LLC$60K
    2 reports
  4. Michael Best Strategies LLC$30K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.