Federal contractor · RICHARDSON, TX

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS received $3.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+307% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $10.5M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($2.9M). It also received $116.7M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$3.3M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EJCVPNN1WFS5
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2017
  2. 372.4KFY2018
  3. 244.8KFY2019
  4. 0FY2020
  5. 173.9KFY2021
  6. 0FY2022
  7. 4.8MFY2023
  8. 798.6KFY2024
  9. 808.4KFY2025
  10. 3.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$3.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Dallas County, TX· Research & development· Apr 23, 2026 – Sep 15, 2026· 80GSFC26C0020
  2. Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Research & development· Nov 6, 2024 – May 29, 2026· W912HQ25C0014
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Professional services· Aug 12, 2025 – Jan 6, 2026· 6973GH25P03071
  4. Federal Trade Commission· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 4, 2024 – Sep 10, 2026· 29FTC124P0007

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS received $116.7M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 451 actions (73 new awards), +8.3% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($47.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$116.7M
New awards
73
Actions
451
Since FY2021
$635.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 130.8MFY2021
  2. 73.8MFY2022
  3. 101.9MFY2023
  4. 104.4MFY2024
  5. 107.8MFY2025
  6. 116.7MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$66.7M57%
  2. Direct payments$49.9M43%
  3. Other assistance$99.9K0.1%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$47.6M41%
  2. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$9M7.7%
  3. 93.866 · Aging Research$6.5M5.5%
  4. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$4.3M3.7%
  5. 84.116 · Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education$4M3.4%
  6. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders$3.9M3.3%
  7. 93.242 · Mental Health Research Grants$3.3M2.8%
  8. 11.617 · Congressionally-Identified Projects$3.1M2.6%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Commerce
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Department of Defense
  5. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 27, 2025 – Sep 15, 2026· P063P253234
  2. 93.279 · Drug Use and Addiction Research Programs· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Sep 19, 2022 – Aug 27, 2026· U19NS130608
  3. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Feb 15, 2022 – Jun 16, 2026· DEAR0001179
  4. 12.420 · Military Medical Research and Development· Defense Health Agency· Project grant· Mar 31, 2022 – Jul 22, 2026· W81XWH1810464
  5. 93.242 · Mental Health Research Grants· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Aug 4, 2022 – Jun 5, 2026· R01MH107512
  6. 93.866 · Aging Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Apr 23, 2021 – Jun 19, 2026· R01AG056535

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.9M (15 subawards)

14 sub-recipients

  1. UPLIFT EDUCATION$375.7K20%
    DALLAS, TX · 1 subaward
  2. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 1 subaward
  3. AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward
  4. FLAGSTAFF, AZ · 1 subaward
  5. DENTON, TX · 1 subaward
  6. DALLAS, TX · 2 subawards
  7. STANFORD, CA · 1 subaward
  8. BOULDER, CO · 1 subaward
  9. CHARLESTOWN, MA · 1 subaward
  10. EVANSTON, IL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $265.5K (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $8.5M (43 subawards)

28 primes

  1. DALLAS, TX · 13 subawards
  2. CLEMSON, SC · 1 subaward
  3. NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward
  4. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 2 subawards
  5. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 1 subaward
  6. WOODS HOLE, MA · 1 subaward
  7. ARLINGTON, TX · 2 subawards
  8. FARMINGTON, CT · 1 subaward
  9. REDONDO BEACH, CA · 1 subaward
  10. SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4.4M paid out · $8.8M received
  • FY2022: $9.2M paid out · $11.6M received
  • FY2023: $9.5M paid out · $6.9M received
  • FY2024: $6.7M paid out · $12.1M received
  • FY2025: $6.3M paid out · $15.8M received
  • FY2026: $1.9M paid out · $8.8M received
  • FY2027: $0 paid out · $119.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

101 companies · $38M reported

  1. DALLAS, TX · 17 subawards
  2. DALLAS, TX · 3 subawards
  3. NEW YORK, NY · 4 subawards

Primes that pay it

100 companies · $64.2M reported

  1. DALLAS, TX · 24 subawards
  2. CINCINNATI, OH · 42 subawards
  3. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 6 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRUWEATHER SOLUTIONS, INC$4.2M+26% in FY2026
    SYRACUSE, NY · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. ROBUST ANALYTICS, INC.$3.2M+50% in FY2026
    GAMBRILLS, MD · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. PROTOINNOVATIONS, LLC$3.3M−100% in FY2026
    PITTSBURGH, PA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • University of Texas - DallasAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$130K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$270K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$30K
    1 reports
  2. 2025$130K
    4 reports
  3. 2026$110K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense7 reports
  2. Manufacturing7 reports
  3. Science and technology7 reports
  4. Energy and nuclear3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES7 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE7 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. VENN STRATEGIES$270K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.