Federal contractor · NORTH LOGAN, UT

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORY

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORY received $153.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 53 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.5B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($106.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$153.4M
New awards
53
Sole-source
97%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Z3KMZ212SL85
Other than small businessNonprofit

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

6 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $155.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORYNORTH LOGAN, UT · Family page
    $153.4M
  2. $2.3M
  3. $450
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 56.1MFY2017
  2. 99.9MFY2018
  3. 141.4MFY2019
  4. 117.3MFY2020
  5. 119.7MFY2021
  6. 158MFY2022
  7. 191.5MFY2023
  8. 197.8MFY2024
  9. 232.9MFY2025
  10. 153.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 28 awards
  2. 20 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$85.2M56%
  2. Professional services$64M42%
  3. IT & telecom$4.2M2.7%
  4. Construction & real property$15.5K0.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition97%
    US 39% · $148.1M
  • Sole-source awards97%
    US 30% · $148.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Cache County, UT· Research & development· Mar 16, 2022 – May 11, 2026· FA945322F0005
  2. THE ATMOSPHERIC WAVES EXPERIMENT (AWE) IS PROPOSED BY THE UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION (USURF) IN RESPONSE TO NASAS 2016 HELIOPHYSICS EXPLORERS MISSION OF OPPORTUNITY ANNOUNCEMENT NNH12ZDA005O-HPEXMO. THIS STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) DESCRIBES THE WORK TO BE CONDUCTED BY USURF DURING THE PHASE A (AWE) CONCEPT STUDIES. USURF SHALL PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES TO PRODUCE THE AWE PHASE A CONCEPT STUDY REPORT (CSR) THAT ENCOMPASSES: 1. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR PROGRAM OFFICE. 2. INSTRUMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING, INCLUDING INSTRUMENT MISSION ASSURANCE. 3. DESIGN OF A FLIGHT QUALIFIED AWE INSTRUMENT MEETING MISSION AND SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. 4. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF INTEGRATION AND TEST OF THE AWE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT SYSTEM. 5. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF ESSENTIAL FIELD OPERATIONS 6. DEVELOP PLANS IN SUPPORT OF LAUNCH OPERATIONS, FLIGHT OPERATIONS. 7. DEVELOP PLANS FOR AND LEAD THE AWE SCIENCE INVESTIGATION, AS WELL AS THE GENERATION OF RESULTING DATA PRODUCTS.USURF SHALL PROVIDE A BRIEFING ON THE AWE SCIENCE AND SCIENCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AT THE PHASE A SITE VISIT. USURF SHALL PROVIDE AN ORGANIZATION CHART DEFINING USURF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, REPORTING PROCEDURES, AND LINES OF AUTHORITY. PARTICIPATE IN DEFINING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE USURF PI PROGRAM OFFICE AND THE NASA EXPLORERS PROGRAM OFFICE.. USURF SHALL DEVELOP A AWE INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT AND A AWE MISSION SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT. USURF SHALL DEVELOP DETAILED BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS. USURF SHALL CONDUCT IN-DEPTH INSTRUMENT-LEVEL REVIEWS OF THE PROPOSED INSTRUMENT DESIGN. CONDUCT ESSENTIAL TRADE STUDIES, ANALYSES, MODELING AND SIMULATIONS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS. USURF SHALL LEAD THE SCIENCE TEAM. USURF SHALL DEVELOP AN INSTRUMENT-LEVEL TEST PLAN AND PARTICIPATE IN PLANNING FOR INTEGRATION AND TEST.$55.9M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Cache County, UT· Research & development· Feb 23, 2018 – Sep 1, 2026· 80GSFC18C0007
  3. Department of the Air Force· Cache County, UT· Professional services· Mar 12, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· FA820424F0001
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Cache County, UT· Research & development· Sep 28, 2022 – Feb 25, 2026· HQ085422F0065
  5. Department of the Navy· Cache County, UT· Professional services· Jan 31, 2024 – May 27, 2026· M6785424C2010
  6. Department of the Navy· Cache County, UT· Research & development· Jul 22, 2024 – Apr 20, 2026· N0017324F2019
  7. Department of the Air Force· Cache County, UT· Research & development· Aug 3, 2023 – May 8, 2026· FA945323F0006
  8. Department of the Air Force· Cache County, UT· Professional services· May 15, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· FA239825FB005

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY SPACE DYNAMICS LABORATORY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$212.2K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 25KFY2021
  2. 75.3KFY2022
  3. 50KFY2023
  4. 61.9KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.7M (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 1 subaward
  2. DAYTONA BEACH, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.9M (2 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $195.2K (1 subaward)

3 primes

  1. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. CHESTNUT HILL, MA · 1 subaward
  3. FORT WAYNE, IN · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.7% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4.5M paid out · $92.5M received
  • FY2022: $2.2M paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $20.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.8M received
  • FY2026: $5.7M paid out · $2.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

150 companies · $268.6M reported

  1. GRANITE SCHOOL DISTRICT$43M
    SOUTH SALT LAKE, UT · 15 subawards
  2. WEST LAFAYETTE, IN · 15 subawards
  3. LOGAN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION$27.9M
    LOGAN, UT · 13 subawards

Primes that pay it

133 companies · $255.8M reported

  1. YORK, PA · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 348 subawards
  3. OAKLAND, CA · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ASSURED INFORMATION SECURITY, INC.$228.8M−17% in FY2026
    ROME, NY · 2 entities · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. ICR, INC.$219.9M−24% in FY2026
    AURORA, CO · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. CQ JV, LLC$365.3M−7.1% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.