Federal contractor · CHULA VISTA, CA

VALVE AUTOMATION AND CONTROL OF SAN DIEGO

VALVE AUTOMATION AND CONTROL OF SAN DIEGO received $307.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($307.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$307.4K
New awards
5
Sole-source
82%
Single offer
18%
UEI
FAZDDLR8M1V1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 400.3KFY2018
  3. 659.1KFY2019
  4. 248.3KFY2020
  5. 35.1KFY2021
  6. 886KFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 369.5KFY2024
  9. 203KFY2025
  10. 307.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$251.9K82%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$55.5K18%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$251.9K82%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $307.4K
  • Sole-source awards82%
    US 30% · $251.9K
  • Single-offer competitions18%
    US 8.7% · $55.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Equipment maintenance· Jan 29, 2026 – May 1, 2026· N0040626PS072
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 16, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· N3220526P0003
  3. Department of the Navy· Equipment maintenance· Apr 13, 2026 – May 6, 2026· N0040626P0021
  4. Department of the Navy· Equipment maintenance· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· N0040626P0156
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· San Diego County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jan 22, 2026 – Jan 22, 2026· HSCG8506P6HCL03

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $15.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $41.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $6.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $441.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $67.7M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 317 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 4 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. PORTLAND, OR · 2 subawards · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PRECISION EQUIPMENT, INC.$1.4M+149% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing+2 more
  2. NAKAJIMA NOZZLE CO., LTD.$349.9K+47% in FY2026
    SASEBO-CITY, JPN · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  3. ELECTRONIC MARINE SYSTEMS, INC.$816.9K−50% in FY2026
    RAHWAY, NJ · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.